2015
DOI: 10.1177/0967010615614137
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Regendering the military: Theorizing women’s military participation

Abstract: Regendering the Military; theorising women's military participation. Abstract Abstract: This paper considers how, in the light of contemporary military transformations, feminist theorizing about women's military participation might be developed to take account of an emergent reality: the inclusion of increasing numbers of women in a range of roles within armed forces. A brief overview of established debates within feminist scholarship on women's military participation is provided, and we explore the trajectory… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

6
105
0
6

Year Published

2015
2015
2020
2020

Publication Types

Select...
4
3
1

Relationship

2
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 90 publications
(117 citation statements)
references
References 76 publications
6
105
0
6
Order By: Relevance
“…Language also becomes complicit in militarization and is in and of itself deeply gendered (Cohn, ), this contributes to the reproduction of gendered power dynamics (Wright and Hurley, ). Military institutions therefore represent an ‘extreme case of the gendered organisation’ (Carreiras, , p. 40), with military activity tied both to male bodies and masculinity (Duncanson and Woodward, , p. 4; Kronsell, , p. 6). CSDP is no exception here, the reliance on Member States to fill positions has resulted in the reproduction of ‘dominant norms and forms’ in the shape of masculine bodies (Kronsell, , p. 7).…”
Section: Feminist Triangles In Eu Policy‐making: Actors and Processesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Language also becomes complicit in militarization and is in and of itself deeply gendered (Cohn, ), this contributes to the reproduction of gendered power dynamics (Wright and Hurley, ). Military institutions therefore represent an ‘extreme case of the gendered organisation’ (Carreiras, , p. 40), with military activity tied both to male bodies and masculinity (Duncanson and Woodward, , p. 4; Kronsell, , p. 6). CSDP is no exception here, the reliance on Member States to fill positions has resulted in the reproduction of ‘dominant norms and forms’ in the shape of masculine bodies (Kronsell, , p. 7).…”
Section: Feminist Triangles In Eu Policy‐making: Actors and Processesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The other research agenda concerns feminist debates on women, peace and security, the changing operational environment of western militaries, and potential military transformations. As we note elsewhere (Duncanson and Woodward 2016) in the context of analysing the extent to which women's military participation represents progress for feminism, it is insufficient to argue that the participation of military women may lead to transformations in military culture and structures. The questions are whether, where, when and how that happens.…”
Section: Gendered Divisions Of Military Labour: Looking Forwardmentioning
confidence: 96%
“…In parallel, much analytic academic commentary on gender in UK military forces moves swiftly on from an acknowledgement of the 10% statistic, using more qualitative data to examine the experiential, political and cultural manifestations of a division of labour which is frequently taken as monolithic across the armed forces (and we would include our own work here: see e.g. Woodward and Winter 2004, Duncanson 2009, Cornish and Duncanson 2012, Duncanson and Woodward 2016). Yet, as we argue in this paper, if we go back to that figure of 10% and start asking how that average is comprised and what disaggregation of that average reveals, a more complex and nuanced picture emerges which mirrors broader social trends in terms of women's labour market participation.…”
Section: Why Women's Military Employment Mattersmentioning
confidence: 98%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…We would also argue, however, that issues around women's military participation are an essential component of broader debates about what, exactly, civil society wants its armed forces to be, and do. 68 The participation of women in USUs is part of that debate. These arguments could also be made about social class.…”
Section: Equalities Politics and Access To Information About Universmentioning
confidence: 99%