Refuting misconceptions in medical physiology

Abstract

Background: In medical physiology, educators and students face a serious challenge termed misconceptions. Misconceptions are incorrect ideas that do not match current scientific views. Accordingly, they have shown to hamper teaching and learning of physiological concepts. Conceptual Change Theory forms the basis of new teaching and learning practices that may alleviate misconceptions and facilitate critical thinking skills that are essential in becoming knowledgeable, self-regulated health professionals. In this study, we examined if such an intervention named refutation texts, could enhance medical students' cognition and metacognition. Methods: First-year medical students (N = 161) performed a pre-test and post-test on cardiovascular physiology concepts, including a self-perceived confidence rating. In between, students read either a standard text with an explanation of the correct answer, or a refutation text which additionally refuted related misconceptions. Results: In both groups, average performance scores (refutation: + 22.5%, standard: + 22.8%) and overall confidence ratings (refutation: Δ0.42 out of 5, standard: Δ0.35 out of 5) increased significantly (all p < .001), but a significant effect of the specific refutation element was not found. Initially incorrect answers were corrected less frequently in cases of high confidence (35.8%) than low confidence (61.4%). Conclusions: Our results showed that refutation texts significantly increased students' knowledge, however, the refutation element did not have a significant additional effect. Furthermore, high confidence in incorrect answers negatively affected the likelihood of correction. These findings provide implications for teaching practices on concept learning, by showing that educators should take into account the key role of metacognition, and the nature of misconceptions.

Teaching digestive system: Spanish pre-service teacher’s learning difficulties and alternative conceptions

“…Human physiology is a difficult discipline to teach and learn as it contains many complex and abstract concepts (Brown et al, 2016;Johnston et al, 2015). In addition, it has many characteristics that favor the emergence and persistence of alternative ideas on the part of pre-service teachers (Andariana et al, 2020;Bordes et al, 2021;Reinoso et al, 2019;Versteeg et al, 2020). One of them is that it requires a comprehensive understanding of other related areas with a lot of practical content, such as molecular biology, histology, biochemistry, etc., disciplines far removed from the educational scope of our pre-service teachers and from the pre-university education received by most of them, thus becoming one of the main handicaps faced by our pre-service teachers.…”

Students' misconceptions on the concept of sound: A case study about Marinyo, Tanimbar Islands

“…The learner's priority should always be involved when trying to understand new information. This situation then requires cognitive reorganization in the brain to accommodate the new information [41]. Misconceptions detrimental to students, and the average is in younger students.…”

Habilidades Metacognitivas en Los Procesos De Aprendizaje en La Educación Superior: Una Revisión Sistemática 2017-2022

“…Por otro lado, se muestra mayor efectividad en determinadas estrategias, entre estas se encuentran la resolución de problemas, aprendizaje colaborativo, textos de refutación y análisis de textos expositivos a través de palabras y títulos clave (Versteeg, et al, 2020;Akben, 2020;Lippmann, 2021;Teng, 2021). Los resultados al aplicar estas estrategias demuestran mejora en los procesos de reflexión, pensamiento crítico, planificación de pasos a seguir en actividades académicas y búsquedas concretas.…”