2012
DOI: 10.1016/j.wasman.2012.04.020
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Refuse derived soluble bio-organics enhancing tomato plant growth and productivity

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

1
37
1
1

Year Published

2012
2012
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
7
1

Relationship

1
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 23 publications
(41 citation statements)
references
References 25 publications
1
37
1
1
Order By: Relevance
“…(i) the no effect Table 1 statistics, this change would result not significant. In this 225 work, no measurements were made on leaves or crop uptake of nutrients since in the previous tomato 8 cultivation study, performed on the same soil with the same soluble substances applied at higher doses, no 227 significant differences were found either in the soil physico-chemical features and in the leaves and crop 228 uptake of nutrients due to the treatment relatively to the control experiment (Sortino et al, 2012).…”
mentioning
confidence: 95%
“…(i) the no effect Table 1 statistics, this change would result not significant. In this 225 work, no measurements were made on leaves or crop uptake of nutrients since in the previous tomato 8 cultivation study, performed on the same soil with the same soluble substances applied at higher doses, no 227 significant differences were found either in the soil physico-chemical features and in the leaves and crop 228 uptake of nutrients due to the treatment relatively to the control experiment (Sortino et al, 2012).…”
mentioning
confidence: 95%
“…In Sortino et al (2012) experiment, bio-organic fertilizer from municipal wastes (kitchen wastes, home gardening residues and public park trimmings) with alkali demonstrated the best results in leaf chlorophyll content, plant growth and tomato fruit ripening rate and yield. In our experiment, application of the bio-organic fertilizer solutions also intensified photosynthesis in sugar beets.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Pruning, weeding by hand pulling and other horticultural operations were done when required [23,77]. as second dose was applied at the eighth week after transplantation [74,77,78]. The annual fertilizer application rates were 68.31 kg·N·ha (DAP + potash) [23].…”
Section: Main Experimental Field Preparation Seedling Transplantatiomentioning
confidence: 99%