Reframing food as a commons in Canada

Abstract

This paper interrogates the role of the dominant narrative of “food-as-commodity” in framing food systems policy in Canada. Human values shape policies, usually privileging those policies that are aligned with dominant values and neglecting others that confront dominant values. In that sense, valuing food as a commodity privileges specific market-based policy goals, regulations, and public subsidies that aim to enlarge market coverage. This prioritizes both corporate profit over societies´ common good and private enclosures of commons resources over universal access to food for all. Conversely, the normative shift this paper proposes—valuing and governing food as a commons—could enable socio-ecologically based policy goals and regulations, and redirect public subsidies to support customary and contemporary practices that produce and distribute food differently. Such a normative shift, scholars have argued, is a prerequisite for developing legal frameworks that lead to more and better 1) self-production; 2) stewardship of natural commons; and 3) civic participation in the governance of a resource that is essential for everybody´s survival. Valuing food as a commons can provide a complementary narrative to alternative civic claims such as food sovereignty, agro-ecology, or food justice. In this paper, we begin by outlining the theoretical basis for our investigation into the role of food valuation in the critical food guidance shaping public policy. Next, we provide an overview of the concept of food as commons through the multidimensional food values framework and offer a tri-centric governance model to frame the analysis. Following a brief policy context for Indigenous food initiatives in Canada, we then provide three case studies involving Anishnaabek food systems to explore valuation of food beyond commodity in customary and contemporary food systems. Finally, we discuss how valuing food as a commons offers critical food guidance for addressing multiple socio-ecological issues connected with food systems policy in the Canadian settler colonial context.

Review of First we eat: Food sovereignty north of 60

“…(Batal et al, 2021). For Crocker and other northern settlers, there is much to be learned from Indigenous peoples in the Yukon, who maintain a relatively high consumption of traditional foods, important for health, community well-being, culture, ecological integrity, and sovereignty (Koberinski et al, 2022;Pratt, 2020). The film highlights the multidimensional values of food and the importance of connecting and learning through communal food networks.…”

Transitioning to a public-minded food system

“…Instead, it is overwhelmingly treated as a commodity at the whims of the market (Koberinski et al, 2022). However, with systems of public food provisioning, like those already observable in lunch programs in public schools, we are reminded that institutional-level support could be possible (Gaddis & Jeon, 2020).…”