2018
DOI: 10.1080/1369118x.2018.1486869
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Reframing community boundaries: the erosive power of new media spaces in authoritarian societies

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
15
0

Year Published

2019
2019
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
7
1

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 16 publications
(15 citation statements)
references
References 26 publications
0
15
0
Order By: Relevance
“…These studies focus on how social media and digital tools are disrupting traditional forms of leadership, altering the structure, norms and hierarchy of organizations, and creating new practices to manage and sustain consensus (David and Baden, 2018). New forms of leadership are for instance defined as horizontal and leaderless (Castells, 2012; Bennett and Segerberg, 2013).…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…These studies focus on how social media and digital tools are disrupting traditional forms of leadership, altering the structure, norms and hierarchy of organizations, and creating new practices to manage and sustain consensus (David and Baden, 2018). New forms of leadership are for instance defined as horizontal and leaderless (Castells, 2012; Bennett and Segerberg, 2013).…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The single case study of the ultra-orthodox community illustrates for instance how authoritarian leadership can be broken down by digital tools and social media (David and Baden, 2018). When the leadership of a closed and conservative religious community is questioned in social media, that creates a new space to renegotiate the community's boundaries and modify its power dynamics: “the fluidity and temporality of digital media have advanced to become an influential, independent factor shaping community opinion” (David and Baden, 2018, p. 14). As such, the identity of a closed and inaccessible community and its leadership are challenged by both internal and external actors through the use of digital media.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Approximately 25% of ultra-Orthodox individuals reported being active on social media platforms such as Facebook and Twitter (Bezek 2020a ). Moreover, of those connected to the Internet, 58% reported being active on social media during the COVID-19 pandemic (Israel Internet Association 2020 ), pointing to the growing centrality of the Internet and social media in the ultra-Orthodox community (David and Baden 2020 ). While Twitter is only sixth in popularity in Israel (Bezek 2020b ), the platform’s general significance stems from its central role in disseminating news and information, as well as serving as the preferred social media platform for journalists, politicians, and social activists (Hedman 2020 ; Molyneux and Mourao 2019 ; Rufai and Bunce 2020 ).…”
Section: Literature Reviewmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The content analysis of the fora and talkbacks was conducted with awareness of the methodological challenge inherent in trying to learn about the ambience in an ideologically closed group. The two websites under study are very popular among ultra-Orthodox online users and are not under direct rabbinic supervision (David and Baden, 2018). The content on the BeHadrei Haredim and Kikar HaShabbat websites is for the most part open to the general public; the latter website is considered the most successful in the ultra-Orthodox community (Cohen, 2015).…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%