1970
DOI: 10.1177/000456327000700102
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Refractometric Determination of Serum Protein Concentration. II. Comparison with Biuret and Kjeldahl Determinations

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

1
7
1

Year Published

1970
1970
1983
1983

Publication Types

Select...
3

Relationship

1
2

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 3 publications
(9 citation statements)
references
References 20 publications
1
7
1
Order By: Relevance
“…Babul and Stellwagen (1969) CDnsidered that variation in RI was due to differences in amino-acid compositiDn, whereas Line.s and Raine (1970a) initially considered that the method was subject not Dnly to' slightly different specific refractiDns of individual proteins, but tD the presence Df variable amounts of nDnprotein material. The latter aspect, however, was found to be unimportant because, although the proteins contributed about 85% of the total dissolved solids in serum, their contribution to the RI was considerably higher (Lines and Raine, 1970a).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 96%
See 4 more Smart Citations
“…Babul and Stellwagen (1969) CDnsidered that variation in RI was due to differences in amino-acid compositiDn, whereas Line.s and Raine (1970a) initially considered that the method was subject not Dnly to' slightly different specific refractiDns of individual proteins, but tD the presence Df variable amounts of nDnprotein material. The latter aspect, however, was found to be unimportant because, although the proteins contributed about 85% of the total dissolved solids in serum, their contribution to the RI was considerably higher (Lines and Raine, 1970a).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 96%
“…For example, the Kjeldahl method, which has been regarded as a standard, depends on the determination of nitrogen content and multiplying either by a factor of 6.25 Henry, 1964) or, as suggested mDre recently, by a factor Df 6.54 (Sunderman, 1966). The: Biuret method depends on the number Df peptide bonds present (Lines and Raine, 1970b), but 'Opinion differs as to what factors are important in refracto~ metry. Babul and Stellwagen (1969) CDnsidered that variation in RI was due to differences in amino-acid compositiDn, whereas Line.s and Raine (1970a) initially considered that the method was subject not Dnly to' slightly different specific refractiDns of individual proteins, but tD the presence Df variable amounts of nDnprotein material.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 3 more Smart Citations