Reformed undergraduate instruction and its subsequent impact on secondary school teaching practice and student achievement

Abstract

The Arizona Collaborative for Excellence in the Preparation of Teachers (ACEPT) Program is one of several reform efforts supported by the National Science Foundation. The primary ACEPT reform mechanism has been month‐long summer workshops in which university and community college science and mathematics faculty learn about instructional reforms and then attempt to apply them in their courses. Previous ACEPT evaluation efforts suggest that, when implemented, the reforms boost undergraduate student achievement. The initial purpose of the present study was to discover whether enrollment of preservice teachers in one or more of these reformed undergraduate courses is linked to the way they teach after they graduate and become in‐service teachers. Assuming that a link is found, a second purpose was to discover whether the presumed positive effect is in turn linked to their students' achievement. In short, the answer appears to be yes, at least among the biology teachers and students surveyed. Compared with controls, the biology teachers who had enrolled in one or more ACEPT reformed course during their teacher preparation program demonstrated significantly higher scores on the measure of reformed instruction and their students demonstrated significantly higher achievement in terms of scientific reasoning, nature of science, and biology concepts. These results support the hypothesis that teachers teach as they have been taught. Furthermore, it appears that instructional reform in teacher preparation programs including both methods and major's courses can improve secondary school student achievement. © 2003 Wiley Periodicals, Inc. J Res Sci Teach 40: 939–957, 2003

Becoming physics people: Development of integrated physics identity through the Learning Assistant experience

“…This course includes readings and discussions about constructivism, metacognition, discipline-based education research studies [11][12][13], and gender bias and stereotype threat in science; discussion emphasizes implications and applications of the concepts or research results from the readings for LAs' experiences both as co-instructors and as students. LAs also work in pairs to perform a series of two clinical interviews, following the Physics Interview Project developed by H. Close at Seattle Pacific University [14], for which the purpose is to develop listening skills for use in the practice of teaching physics.…”

Model Based Inquiry in the High School Physics Classroom: An Exploratory Study of Implementation and Outcomes

“…I created an ''experiment log'' which is general enough, but perhaps will encourage more thought about experimental design PASKS was established in the ACEPT project. Subsequent studies supported by measures taken with PASKS were then reported in research emerging from the project (Adamson et al 2003;Sawada et al 2002). The content section of the PASKS was the only section that was revised.…”

Approaches to Biology Teaching and Learning: On Integrating Pedagogical Training into the Graduate Experiences of Future Science Faculty

“…If one subscribes to the adage that "one teaches the way one was taught," then effective pedagogy becomes doubly important for this student group. In fact, evidence from a recent study on this topic suggests that high school biology teachers who have experienced reformed undergraduate courses that use more inquiry-based teaching techniques are more likely than a comparison set of teachers to 1) exhibit these pedagogical styles in their high school classrooms and 2) have students that show significantly higher levels of achievement on measures of scientific reasoning and biological concept knowledge (Adamson et al, 2003).…”