2022
DOI: 10.1177/20571585221126594
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Reflections about handling interview data from third countries at European universities: Collaboration opportunities and/or risky business for participants and researchers?

Abstract: Through reflections about a case study concerning an unfeasible, planned research study on nurses’ working days during the COVID-19 pandemic, the article aims to describe and discuss legal and ethical challenges when conducting European-based research together with nurses in third countries. The article highlights how the General Data Protection Regulation challenges EU and non-EU research collaborations and research across borders in healthcare research. Digitally recorded interview data can be traced, puttin… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1

Citation Types

0
1
0

Year Published

2024
2024
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
1

Relationship

1
0

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 1 publication
(1 citation statement)
references
References 20 publications
0
1
0
Order By: Relevance
“…49 The idea of the GDPR is essentially good, but interpretation and implementation of the regulation have consequences far beyond its intended purpose, not least in research, when research ethics and the GDPR overlap. 50 The submission of an ethical approval is resource consuming in terms of both time and money, at times leading to a tacit exclusion of research by researchers with limited economic resources. In addition, it can complicate international research collaboration, as researchers in Sweden, unlike in other countries, need to follow special requirements regarding the use of publicly published material with health content about individuals as empirical material in research.…”
Section: E R H E R Hmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…49 The idea of the GDPR is essentially good, but interpretation and implementation of the regulation have consequences far beyond its intended purpose, not least in research, when research ethics and the GDPR overlap. 50 The submission of an ethical approval is resource consuming in terms of both time and money, at times leading to a tacit exclusion of research by researchers with limited economic resources. In addition, it can complicate international research collaboration, as researchers in Sweden, unlike in other countries, need to follow special requirements regarding the use of publicly published material with health content about individuals as empirical material in research.…”
Section: E R H E R Hmentioning
confidence: 99%