2006
DOI: 10.2355/isijinternational.46.840
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Refinement of Solidification Microstructure and Austenite Grain by Fine Inclusion Particles

Abstract: The effect of deoxidation products of Ce 2 O 3 , ZrO 2 and MgO particles on solidification microstructure has been studied in Fe-10mass%Ni, Fe-0.20mass%C-0.02mass%P and Fe-0.50mass%C-1mass%Mn alloys. The degree of the equiaxed crystallization is explained by the lattice misfit parameter between g (or d)-Fe and oxide. The single-phase solidification microstructure of Fe-10mass%Ni and Fe-0.50mass%C-1mass%Mn alloys is well related to austenite grain boundaries under the inhibition of grain growth by pinning. The … Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
41
0

Year Published

2009
2009
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
7
1
1

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 69 publications
(41 citation statements)
references
References 8 publications
0
41
0
Order By: Relevance
“…17 The occurrence of d-ferrite islands is less frequent in the PK942Zr sample, which may be explained by the fact that ZrO 2 is a heterogeneous nucleation site during the solidification of austenite, therefore inhibiting d-ferrite nucleation. 18 This can be beneficial as d-ferrite can be harmful to the final properties and the hot working is reduced by annealing. 19 Other than the difference in d-ferrite, there are no significant differences in the microstructure.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…17 The occurrence of d-ferrite islands is less frequent in the PK942Zr sample, which may be explained by the fact that ZrO 2 is a heterogeneous nucleation site during the solidification of austenite, therefore inhibiting d-ferrite nucleation. 18 This can be beneficial as d-ferrite can be harmful to the final properties and the hot working is reduced by annealing. 19 Other than the difference in d-ferrite, there are no significant differences in the microstructure.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…When the volume fraction of second phase particles is large, the interparticle spacing may have the same value or smaller value than the grain size and Eq. [9] would no longer be applicable. Considering the effects of boundary-particle correlation, the following equation is used to estimate the maximum pinning pressure P ZC , when all the particles are located at the grain corners: [32][33][34][35] …”
Section: B Austenite Particle Pinning Effectsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Some authors proposed the use of oxide dispersions to pin grain growth at high temperatures. [8,9] While promising results have been obtained using this approach, the main challenges are how to produce fine dispersions of these particles in the caster. In the absence of particle pinning, austenite grains in excess of 2 mm may form prior to the onset of thermomechanical processing.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In the previous paper, 28) it has been reported that the density of ferrite precipitation didn't have a clear dependence with Zener's pining force 51) or austenite grain size, but a correlation seemed to exist with the particle size. Figure 12 shows the relationship between the inclusion density and ferrite density obtained the experiments as shown Fig.…”
Section: Ferrite Precipitationmentioning
confidence: 99%