1994
DOI: 10.1016/0167-4730(94)90015-9
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Refined second-order reliability analysis

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

0
50
0

Year Published

1995
1995
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
6
2
1

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 133 publications
(50 citation statements)
references
References 8 publications
0
50
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Tvedt [18] proposed a three-term approximation in which the last two terms can be interpreted as correctors to Breitung's form. More accurate closed form formulas were derived using Maclaurin series expansion and Taylor series expansion [19] [20]. These formulas generally work well in the case of a large curvature radius and a small number of random variables.…”
Section: Second-order Reliability Methods (Sorm)mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Tvedt [18] proposed a three-term approximation in which the last two terms can be interpreted as correctors to Breitung's form. More accurate closed form formulas were derived using Maclaurin series expansion and Taylor series expansion [19] [20]. These formulas generally work well in the case of a large curvature radius and a small number of random variables.…”
Section: Second-order Reliability Methods (Sorm)mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…To alleviate this problem, many recent researches were aimed at using more accurate approximations and efficient search methods. These techniques cover Monte Carlo Method based on first-and second-order approximations to the failure region (Sweeting and Finn 1992), refined second-order reliability analysis (Cai and Elishakoff 1994), first-order third-moment reliability method (Tichy 1994), SOP~M (second-order reliability method) integrals based on new and simple closed form approximations (Koyluoglu and Nielsen 1994), physical and normal spaces (Lin and Khalessi 1993), the simplified safety index algorithm (l~eddy et al 1994), the advanced mean value (AMV) procedure (Wu et al 1990), etc. Earlier developed a safety index algorithm utilizing the nonlinear approximation of the performance function (g-function) in original space (X-space) of random variables.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In addition, ( 1,2) i i D are independent random variables with Beta distribution, of which the probability density function is written as The failure probability of the random beam is computed by four methods, i.e., FORM, SORM, OSFEM-P, DMC. the results of failure probability calculated by these four methods are listed in Table 1.…”
Section: Figure 1 Random Continuous Beammentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Since multiple probability factors existed in the safety analysis of structural component or system, a multi-fold integral needs to be calculated to obtain the failure probability of the structure. However, even if the performance function is explicit, the nonlinearity of the function and the non-Gaussian distribution of random variables always make it impossible to obtain the exact solution of this multi-fold integral [1], [2]. Various methods have been used to analyze the failure probability of structures subjected to random material parameters, such as the first-and second-order reliability methods (FORM/SORM) [3], [4], the simulation methods [5]- [7], the traditional perturbation stochastic finite element methods (PSFEM) [8], [9], the response surface method [10], [11], and so on.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%