2015
DOI: 10.1016/j.jpeds.2014.10.038
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Referral of Very Low Birth Weight Infants to High-Risk Follow-Up at Neonatal Intensive Care Unit Discharge Varies Widely across California

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
37
0

Year Published

2017
2017
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
6
2
1

Relationship

1
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 52 publications
(37 citation statements)
references
References 28 publications
(12 reference statements)
0
37
0
Order By: Relevance
“…We aim to tie our current study findings to long-term outcomes in the future through the CPQCC-California Children's Services High Risk Infant Follow-up Quality of Care Initiative, which collects data on outcomes at 2 years of age for eligible patients. 37 abbRevIaTIOns CI: confidence interval CPQCC: California Perinatal Quality Care Collaborative GA: gestational age OR: odds ratio PDA: patent ductus arteriosus VLBW: very low birth weight…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…We aim to tie our current study findings to long-term outcomes in the future through the CPQCC-California Children's Services High Risk Infant Follow-up Quality of Care Initiative, which collects data on outcomes at 2 years of age for eligible patients. 37 abbRevIaTIOns CI: confidence interval CPQCC: California Perinatal Quality Care Collaborative GA: gestational age OR: odds ratio PDA: patent ductus arteriosus VLBW: very low birth weight…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Families caring for high-risk infants face multiple challenges in meeting their child's health needs, which are pronounced in underserved populations. For example, Hispanic and Black families are less likely to be referred to high-risk infant follow up programs [6] and Black families are five to eight times less likely to follow up at the 24 month visit in early intervention programs [7]. Disparities in transition-to-home and follow-up for families who have limited English proficiency and/or are minorities or low-income exist and may be reduced by engaging families in the process of re-designing transition of care from NICU-to-home [3,4,[8][9][10].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…These process-improvement strategies were implemented in collaboration with the CPQCC-CCS HRIF Quality of Care Initiative after an analysis demonstrated poor HRIF referral rates from California NICUs for eligible high-risk infants. 16 We were surprised and encouraged that most respondents felt they had adequate resources to communicate with non-English speakers. This is reassuring in light of the fact that in California 44% of residents speak a language other than English (compared with 21% nationally), and 19% of residents speak English less than "very well."…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Additional details regarding the organizational structure of this statewide network of HRIF programs are described in previous studies. 15,16…”
Section: Study Settingmentioning
confidence: 99%