Objective: To evaluate physician burnout, well-being, and work unit safety grades in relationship to perceived major medical errors. Participants and Methods: From August 28, 2014, to October 6, 2014, we conducted a population-based survey of US physicians in active practice regarding burnout, fatigue, suicidal ideation, work unit safety grade, and recent medical errors. Multivariate logistic regression and mixed-effects hierarchical models evaluated the associations among burnout, well-being measures, work unit safety grades, and medical errors. Results: Of 6695 responding physicians in active practice, 6586 provided information on the areas of interest: 3574 (54.3%) reported symptoms of burnout, 2163 (32.8%) reported excessive fatigue, and 427 (6.5%) reported recent suicidal ideation, with 255 of 6563 (3.9%) reporting a poor or failing patient safety grade in their primary work area and 691 of 6586 (10.5%) reporting a major medical error in the prior 3 months. Physicians reporting errors were more likely to have symptoms of burnout (77.6% vs 51.5%; P<.001), fatigue (46.6% vs 31.2%; P<.001), and recent suicidal ideation (12.7% vs 5.8%; P<.001). In multivariate modeling, perceived errors were independently more likely to be reported by physicians with burnout (odds ratio [OR], 2.22; 95% CI, 1.79–2.76) or fatigue (OR, 1.38; 95% CI, 1.15–1.65) and those with incrementally worse work unit safety grades (OR, 1.70; 95% CI, 1.36–2.12; OR, 1.92; 95% CI, 1.48–2.49; OR, 3.12; 95% CI, 2.13–4.58; and OR, 4.37; 95% CI, 2.06–9.28 for grades of B, C, D, and F, respectively), adjusted for demographic and clinical characteristics. Conclusion: In this large national study, physician burnout, fatigue, and work unit safety grades were independently associated with major medical errors. Interventions to reduce rates of medical errors must address both physician well-being and work unit safety.

Background: Whether healthcare provider burnout contributes to lower quality of patient care is unclear.Purpose: To estimate the overall relationship between burnout and quality of care, and to evaluate if published studies provide exaggerated estimates of this relationship.

Background Burnout is widespread among healthcare providers and is associated with adverse safety behaviours, operational and clinical outcomes. Little is known with regard to the explanatory links between burnout and these adverse outcomes. Objectives (1) Test the psychometric properties of a brief four-item burnout scale, (2) Provide neonatal intensive care unit (NICU) burnout and resilience benchmarking data across different units and caregiver types, (3) Examine the relationships between caregiver burnout and patient safety culture. Research design Cross-sectional survey study. Subjects Nurses, nurse practitioners, respiratory care providers and physicians in 44 NICUs. Measures Caregiver assessments of burnout and safety culture. Results Of 3294 administered surveys, 2073 were returned for an overall response rate of 62.9%. The percentage of respondents in each NICU reporting burnout ranged from 7.5% to 54.4% (mean=25.9%, SD=10.8). The four-item burnout scale was reliable (α=0.85) and appropriate for aggregation (intra-class correlation coefficient−2=0.95). Burnout varied significantly between NICUs, p<0.0001, but was less prevalent in physicians (mean=15.1%, SD=19.6) compared with non-physicians (mean=26.9%, SD=11.4, p=0.0004). NICUs with more burnout had lower teamwork climate (r=−0.48, p=0.001), safety climate (r=−0.40, p=0.01), job satisfaction (r=−0.64, p<0.0001), perceptions of management (r=−0.50, p=0.0006) and working conditions (r=−0.45, p=0.002). Conclusions NICU caregiver burnout appears to have ‘climate-like’ features, is prevalent, and associated with lower perceptions of patient safety culture.

Purpose: Racial/ethnic disparities in severe maternal morbidity (SMM) are substantial, but little is known about whether these disparities are changing over time or the role of maternal and obstetric factors. Methods: We examined disparities in SMM prevalence and trends using linked birth certificate and delivery discharge records from Californian births during 1997-2014 (n = 8,252,025). Results: The prevalence of SMM was highest in non-Hispanic (NH) Black women (1.63%), lowest in NH White women (0.84%), and increased from 1997-2014 by approximately 170% in each racial/ethnic group. The magnitude of SMM disparities remained consistent over time. Compared to NH White women, the adjusted risk of SMM was higher in women who identified as

BACKGROUND Differences in neonatal intensive care unit (NICU) quality of care provided to very-low-birth-weight (VLBW; <1500g) infants may contribute to the persistence of racial/ethnic disparity. An examination of such disparities in a population-based sample across multiple dimensions of care and outcomes is lacking. METHODS Prospective observational analysis of 18,616 VLBW infants in 134 California NICUs between January 1, 2010 to December 31, 2014. We assessed quality of care delivery via the Baby-MONITOR, a composite indicator consisting of nine process and outcome measures of quality. For each NICU we calculated a risk adjusted composite and individual component quality score for each race/ethnicity. We standardized each score to the overall population to compare quality of care between and within NICUs. RESULTS We found clinically and statistically significant racial/ethnic variation in quality of care delivery between NICUs as well as within NICUs. Composite quality scores ranged by 5.26 standard units (range −2.30 to 2.96). Adjustment of Baby-MONITOR scores by race/ethnicity had only minimal effect on comparative assessments of NICU performance. Among subcomponents of the Baby-MONITOR, non-Hispanic White infants scored higher on measures of process compared with non-Hispanic Blacks and Hispanics. Compared with Whites, non-Hispanic Blacks scored higher on measures of outcome; Hispanics scored lower on seven of the nine Baby-MONITOR subcomponents. CONCLUSION Significant racial/ethnic variation in quality of care delivery exists between and within NICUs. Providing feedback of disparity scores to NICUs could serve as an important starting point for promoting improvement and reducing disparities.

IMPORTANCE Pay for performance is intended to align incentives to promote high-quality care, but results have been contradictory.OBJECTIVE To test the effect of explicit financial incentives to reward guidelinerecommended hypertension care. DESIGN, SETTING, AND PARTICIPANTSCluster randomized trial of 12 Veterans Affairs outpatient clinics with 5 performance periods and a 12-month washout that enrolled 83 primary care physicians and 42 nonphysician personnel (eg, nurses, pharmacists).INTERVENTIONS Physician-level (individual) incentives, practice-level incentives, both, or none. Intervention participants received up to 5 payments every 4 months; all participants could access feedback reports.MAIN OUTCOMES AND MEASURES Among a random sample, number of patients achieving guideline-recommended blood pressure thresholds or receiving an appropriate response to uncontrolled blood pressure, number of patients prescribed guideline-recommended medications, and number who developed hypotension.

BackgroundHealthcare is approaching a tipping point as burnout and dissatisfaction with work-life integration (WLI) in healthcare workers continue to increase. A scale evaluating common behaviours as actionable examples of WLI was introduced to measure work-life balance.Objectives(1) Explore differences in WLI behaviours by role, specialty and other respondent demographics in a large healthcare system. (2) Evaluate the psychometric properties of the work-life climate scale, and the extent to which it acts like a climate, or group-level norm when used at the work setting level. (3) Explore associations between work-life climate and other healthcare climates including teamwork, safety and burnout.MethodsCross-sectional survey study completed in 2016 of US healthcare workers within a large academic healthcare system.Results10 627 of 13 040 eligible healthcare workers across 440 work settings within seven entities of a large healthcare system (81% response rate) completed the routine safety culture survey. The overall work-life climate scale internal consistency was α=0.830. WLI varied significantly among healthcare worker role, length of time in specialty and work setting. Random effects analyses of variance for the work-life climate scale revealed significant between-work setting and within-work setting variance and intraclass correlations reflected clustering at the work setting level. T-tests of top versus bottom WLI quartile work settings revealed that positive work-life climate was associated with better teamwork and safety climates, as well as lower personal burnout and burnout climate (p<0.001).ConclusionProblems with WLI are common in healthcare workers and differ significantly based on position and time in specialty. Although typically thought of as an individual difference variable, WLI appears to operate as a climate, and is consistently associated with better safety culture norms.

Background Improving the resiliency of healthcare workers is a national imperative, driven in part by healthcare workers having minimal exposure to the skills and culture to achieve work–life balance (WLB). Regardless of current policies, healthcare workers feel compelled to work more and take less time to recover from work. Satisfaction with WLB has been measured, as has work–life conflict, but how frequently healthcare workers engage in specific WLB behaviours is rarely assessed. Measurement of behaviours may have advantages over measurement of perceptions; behaviours more accurately reflect WLB and can be targeted by leaders for improvement. Objectives To describe a novel survey scale for evaluating work–life climate based on specific behavioural frequencies in healthcare workers. To evaluate the scale’s psychometric properties and provide benchmarking data from a large healthcare system. To investigate associations between work–life climate, teamwork climate and safety climate. Methods Cross-sectional survey study of US healthcare workers within a large healthcare system. Results 7923 of 9199 eligible healthcare workers across 325 work settings within 16 hospitals completed the survey in 2009 (86% response rate). The overall work–life climate scale internal consistency was Cronbach α=0.790. t-Tests of top versus bottom quartile work settings revealed that positive work–life climate was associated with better teamwork climate, safety climate and increased participation in safety leadership WalkRounds with feedback (p<0.001). Univariate analysis of variance demonstrated differences that varied significantly in WLB between healthcare worker role, hospitals and work setting. Conclusions The work–life climate scale exhibits strong psychometric properties, elicits results that vary widely by work setting, discriminates between positive and negative workplace norms, and aligns well with other culture constructs that have been found to correlate with clinical outcomes.