1986
DOI: 10.2307/2786722
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Reference Groups and Self-Appraisals of Academic Ability and Performance

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

2
33
0
1

Year Published

2001
2001
2019
2019

Publication Types

Select...
6
3

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 45 publications
(36 citation statements)
references
References 12 publications
2
33
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…Specifically, based on the premise of self-appraisal, if individuals compare themselves (i.e., perceive ourselves as similar) to prototypes of others who experience negative outcomes, these appraisals will be more predictive of their own self-appraisal (Felson & Reed, 1986). These appraisals might affect individual attitudes and subsequent behaviors.…”
Section: Lovementioning
confidence: 92%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Specifically, based on the premise of self-appraisal, if individuals compare themselves (i.e., perceive ourselves as similar) to prototypes of others who experience negative outcomes, these appraisals will be more predictive of their own self-appraisal (Felson & Reed, 1986). These appraisals might affect individual attitudes and subsequent behaviors.…”
Section: Lovementioning
confidence: 92%
“…The social comparison literature argues that each of these goals is a possible motive behind social comparison. Felson and Reed (1986) argued, "other people's performances and self-appraisals are sometimes highly predictive of our own self-appraisals" (p. 103). Further, the goal of self-enhancement or self-protection could provide the motivation an individual needs to personalize the risk of HIV and to engage in safer sexual communication and behavior (Fisher & Fisher, 1992a;Fisher & Fisher, 1992b;Fisher & Fisher, 1992c).…”
Section: Social Comparison Theorymentioning
confidence: 96%
“…The gifted students had median percentile scores of M 090.19 (SD 011.86). Due to the HLM approach we adopted in this study, classes including less than 10 students were not integrated in our multi-level analyses (Felson & Reed, 1986). This selection criteria resulted in analyzing 33 classes with a medium class size of about 23 students (M 022.62; SD 05.56).…”
Section: Participants and Data Collectionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The data used in this study came from a representative sample for the lower, middle, and higher tracks of the German education system and also included a sample of gifted students. We excluded 5 classrooms (2 from the lower track, 3 from the gifted track) with less than 10 students from all analyses because class level scores based on less than 10 cases usually lack validity (Felson & Reed, 1986).…”
Section: Participantsmentioning
confidence: 99%