2013
DOI: 10.2139/ssrn.2892646
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Reference Dependent Preferences and the EPK Puzzle

Abstract: Supported by several recent investigations, the empirical pricing kernel (EPK) puzzle might be considered a stylized fact. Based on an economic model with state dependent preferences for the financial investors, we want to emphasize a microeconomic view that succeeds in explaining the puzzle. We retain the expected utility framework in a one period model and illustrate the case when the state is defined with respect to a reference point. We further investigate how the model relates the shape of the EPK to the … Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1

Citation Types

0
2
0

Year Published

2013
2013
2016
2016

Publication Types

Select...
5

Relationship

0
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 5 publications
(2 citation statements)
references
References 50 publications
0
2
0
Order By: Relevance
“…where g t is decreasing (in markets where E[S T ] > S 0 e rT ). There is empirical evidence that this relationship may not hold in practice, which is called the pricing kernel puzzle (Brown and Jackwerth (2004), Grith et al (2013)). Many explanations have been provided in the literature (Brown and Jackwerth (2004), Hens and Reichlin (2013)), including state-dependence of preferences (Chabi-Yo et al (2008)).…”
Section: Framework and Notationmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…where g t is decreasing (in markets where E[S T ] > S 0 e rT ). There is empirical evidence that this relationship may not hold in practice, which is called the pricing kernel puzzle (Brown and Jackwerth (2004), Grith et al (2013)). Many explanations have been provided in the literature (Brown and Jackwerth (2004), Hens and Reichlin (2013)), including state-dependence of preferences (Chabi-Yo et al (2008)).…”
Section: Framework and Notationmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…While such approach can be used in order to allow for flexible pricing kernels, which exhibit increasing sections, one should not take the model literally. Haerdle, Kraetschmer, and Moro (2009) was subsumed by Grith, Haerdle, and Kraetschmer (2015), who piece together the pricing kernel from many segments which (between referent points) are decreasing but can jump upwards at the reference points.…”
Section: Piece-wise Approximations Of the Pricing Kernelmentioning
confidence: 99%