2009
DOI: 10.2753/pss0885-3134290303
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Reexamining the Influence of Career Stages on Salesperson Motivation: A Cognitive and Affective Perspective

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

4
18
0
4

Year Published

2011
2011
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
6
2
1

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 36 publications
(27 citation statements)
references
References 2 publications
4
18
0
4
Order By: Relevance
“…Consistent with career timetable theory, we propose that there are social norms regarding how much mobility is considered appropriate for individuals in different career stages (Gibson, 2003;Miao, Lund, & Evans, 2009). Specifically, early-career workers are expected to have more job changes than mid-and late-career workers.…”
Section: Moderating Effects Of Career Stagementioning
confidence: 79%
“…Consistent with career timetable theory, we propose that there are social norms regarding how much mobility is considered appropriate for individuals in different career stages (Gibson, 2003;Miao, Lund, & Evans, 2009). Specifically, early-career workers are expected to have more job changes than mid-and late-career workers.…”
Section: Moderating Effects Of Career Stagementioning
confidence: 79%
“…When compensation is tied to an activity blueprint, cost prioritization signals that effort placed on sales activities while under watchful resource constraints count more than the results of those efforts. Such a signal is likely to demotivate the sales force whose expectancies (i.e., perceived link between effort and performance) and instrumentalities (i.e., perceived link between performance and reward) are typically associated with achieving sales productivity (Johnston & Marshall, 2013;Miao et al, 2009). Additionally, with behavior control, a cost prioritized sales manager may carefully monitor the costs associated with each activity, further straining the sales force as they figure out which behaviors are cost effective and which are not.…”
Section: Behavior Controlmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Since financial remuneration is often a primary reason to pursue a sales position (Miao, Lund, & Evans, 2009), perceived resource constraints shift the relative quality of alternative job opportunities (i.e., ease of departure). Second, a salesperson's commitment to the organization is often a function of key relationships within the organization, such as with their sales manager (Boles et al, 2012).…”
Section: Cost Prioritization and Turnovermentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Nesse contexto, a literatura de marketing vem intensificando as pesquisas inerentes aos sistemas de controles (Miao & Evans, 2012, 2014. Os sistemas de controle de vendas são as políticas formais (Kuster & Canales, 2011), regras e procedimentos empregados por organizações para influenciar e direcionar a motivação (Miao, Lund, & Evans, 2009) e o comportamento para os resultados de vendas (Anderson & Oliver, 1987;Miao, Evans, & Zou, 2007).…”
Section: Sistema De Controleunclassified