1999
DOI: 10.1148/radiology.213.2.r99nv37521
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Reevaluation of the Standardized Uptake Value for FDG: Variations with Body Weight and Methods for Correction

Abstract: SUVlbm and SUVbsa are weight-independent indices for FDG uptake, and SUVlbm appears to be more appropriate for quantifying FDG uptake to avoid overestimation of glucose utilization in obese patients.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

5
148
1
3

Year Published

2007
2007
2015
2015

Publication Types

Select...
4
4
1

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 223 publications
(158 citation statements)
references
References 13 publications
5
148
1
3
Order By: Relevance
“…Impaired glucose metabolism or diabetes can affect FDG uptake and decrease PET sensitivity in detecting smaller lesions (22)(23)(24). Patients with a large volume of body fat may alter FDG uptake in normal tissues and the tumor (25,26). Other factors that can influence FDG bio-distribution include steroids, sedative use to induce muscle relaxation during scanning, and the patient's hydration status (18).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Impaired glucose metabolism or diabetes can affect FDG uptake and decrease PET sensitivity in detecting smaller lesions (22)(23)(24). Patients with a large volume of body fat may alter FDG uptake in normal tissues and the tumor (25,26). Other factors that can influence FDG bio-distribution include steroids, sedative use to induce muscle relaxation during scanning, and the patient's hydration status (18).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…For FDG-PET the SUV max was corrected for lean body mass (SUL max ) in order to exclude any influence of body shape. 19,24 Each SUL max for FDG-PET or SUV max for MET-PET was analyzed based on the pathological findings after surgery. The diagnostic validity of SUL max or SUV max was also compared with the tumor proliferation index using an MIB-1 monoclonal antibody (MIB-1 index).…”
Section: Pet Analysismentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Although there are several reports that present lymph node detection [3,4], these methods detect lymph nodes based on SUV [7] primary from PET images or detect in 2-D image processing way. There is no method that detects lymph nodes directly from 3-D images.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%