2014
DOI: 10.1007/s10967-014-3076-3
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Reevaluation of neutron flux characterization parameters for NIST RT-2 facility

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1

Citation Types

0
2
0

Year Published

2016
2016
2020
2020

Publication Types

Select...
6
1

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 7 publications
(2 citation statements)
references
References 12 publications
0
2
0
Order By: Relevance
“…This method has been highly touted as an accurate method of Instrumental NAA (INAA) [13] and has been implemented at several facilities around the world. Recent research using the reactor at the National Institute of Standards and Technology (NIST) has shown that limitations exist with this methodology when considering a highly thermalized reactor spectrum [14]. It was found that owing to the low-energy resonances in many non-1/v isotopes, the K 0 method yields incorrect reaction rates for highly thermalized fluxes.…”
Section: B Estimation Of Effective Fission-product Yields Via Origenmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This method has been highly touted as an accurate method of Instrumental NAA (INAA) [13] and has been implemented at several facilities around the world. Recent research using the reactor at the National Institute of Standards and Technology (NIST) has shown that limitations exist with this methodology when considering a highly thermalized reactor spectrum [14]. It was found that owing to the low-energy resonances in many non-1/v isotopes, the K 0 method yields incorrect reaction rates for highly thermalized fluxes.…”
Section: B Estimation Of Effective Fission-product Yields Via Origenmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…There are also measurements that provide additional validation of the calculations used for operational and safety support. Measurements of neutron flux can be based on foil irradiations such as those used in the past to make measurements in the RT-2 rabbit facility in order to facilitate its use for activation analysis (Lindstrom, 2008 andŞahin, 2014). This provides a local measurement as opposed to a global measurement such as reactivity and is important as the most significant change in the reactor due to the replacement of the HEU with LEU is a shift of the peak flux distribution from the outer core to the inner core.…”
Section: Other Testsmentioning
confidence: 99%