2017
DOI: 10.5209/fite.57469
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Reevaluación de los parámetros del sismo mayor de Fez del 11 de mayo de 1624

Abstract: Abstract. The 11 May 1624 Fez earthquake is one of the worst natural disasters in the history of Morocco, and caused serious damage in the city of Fez and its surroundings. It occurred in one of the most active seismic zones in the country, and in an area that is now densely populated. The 1624 earthquake occurred at a crucial time in the history of Morocco (decline of the Saadian dynasty and outbreak of internal wars) which explains the lack of sufficient information on the extensive devastation that resulted… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

2
5
0

Year Published

2020
2020
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
3
1
1

Relationship

0
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 5 publications
(7 citation statements)
references
References 7 publications
2
5
0
Order By: Relevance
“…According to scaling relationships (e.g., Thingbaijam et al, 2017;Wells & Coppersmith, 1994), this range of surface lengths for reverse faults generally correspond to maximum moment magnitudes of about 6.4-6.8 (Table 5). These magnitude estimates are compatible with intensities ranging between VII and VIII for moderate to large historical earthquakes reported for this region since the eleventh century, and particularly with that of the 1755 Fès-Meknès Earthquake (Blanc, 2009;Cherkaoui et al, 2017;El Mrabet, 2005;Peláez et al, 2007;Mourabit et al, 2014;Roux, 1934). Since scaling laws are statistically consistent with self-similarity (e.g., Thingbaijam et al, 2017), relationships between rupture (2) a thick-skinned option where the reverse fault connects to inherited basement faults, dipping at 60°.…”
Section: Seismic Hazard Parameterssupporting
confidence: 83%
See 3 more Smart Citations
“…According to scaling relationships (e.g., Thingbaijam et al, 2017;Wells & Coppersmith, 1994), this range of surface lengths for reverse faults generally correspond to maximum moment magnitudes of about 6.4-6.8 (Table 5). These magnitude estimates are compatible with intensities ranging between VII and VIII for moderate to large historical earthquakes reported for this region since the eleventh century, and particularly with that of the 1755 Fès-Meknès Earthquake (Blanc, 2009;Cherkaoui et al, 2017;El Mrabet, 2005;Peláez et al, 2007;Mourabit et al, 2014;Roux, 1934). Since scaling laws are statistically consistent with self-similarity (e.g., Thingbaijam et al, 2017), relationships between rupture (2) a thick-skinned option where the reverse fault connects to inherited basement faults, dipping at 60°.…”
Section: Seismic Hazard Parameterssupporting
confidence: 83%
“…According to scaling relationships (e.g., Wells and Coppersmith, 1994;Thingbaijam et al, 2017), this range of surface lengths for reverse faults generally correspond to maximum moment magnitudes of about 6.4-6.8 (Table 5). These magnitude estimates are compatible with intensities ranging between VII and VIII for moderate to large historical earthquakes reported for this region since the eleventh century, and particularly with that of the 1755 Fès-Meknès Earthquake (Roux, 1934;El Mrabet, 2005;Paláez et al 2007;Blanc, 2009;Mourabit et al, 2014;Cherkaoui et al, 2017).…”
Section: Seismic Hazard Parameterssupporting
confidence: 80%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…1) would have been the cause of several topographical upheavals (El Mrabet, 1991;Chaouki, 1991) [17][5] and many large-scale landslides (El Fellah et al 1996, Labriki et al 2019 [16][23].The fez earthquake on 11-05-1624 (tab. 1) was considered, with the Lisbon earthquake in 1755, as the strongest historical seismic event that affected Fez and its surroundings (Cherkaoui et al, 2017) [8]. So, due to the proximity of the Tamda landslide to the epicentral region of the Fez earthquake, and its position on the southern limit of the central Middle Atlas great fault, we can consider this dam landslide as a contemporary seismic event.…”
Section: The Triggering Factorsmentioning
confidence: 99%