2008
DOI: 10.3354/meps07622
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Reef structure regulates small-scale spatial variation in coral bleaching

Abstract: Coral bleaching is often characterized by high spatial variation across reef systems. Using a field survey and manipulative experiment, we tested whether the physical structure of coral reefs modifies environmental conditions that, in turn, influence spatial variation in bleaching in 3 scleractinian corals, Pocillopora verrucosa, Acropora elseyi, and Porites rus. Corals inhabit mainly the hard-bottom seafloor, or dead or partially dead coral heads ('bommies'). Bommies (0.10 to 3.0 m tall) position corals at di… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

2
47
0

Year Published

2009
2009
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
10

Relationship

1
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 54 publications
(50 citation statements)
references
References 76 publications
2
47
0
Order By: Relevance
“…A previous study at this site, designed to test whether total zooplankton flux influenced corals, found no relationship between skeletal growth and particulate food flux (Alldredge et al 2013), thereby suggesting that hydrodynamicallyenhanced autotrophy, rather than heterotrophy, was the more important factor in our study. We also observed no differences in temperature across the sites during the assay, and saw no differences in light levels in a previous study (Lenihan et al 2008), so we cannot attribute growth differences to these often-considered factors. Differences in coral growth among treatments were also closely associated with corallivore abundance and feeding behavior.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 70%
“…A previous study at this site, designed to test whether total zooplankton flux influenced corals, found no relationship between skeletal growth and particulate food flux (Alldredge et al 2013), thereby suggesting that hydrodynamicallyenhanced autotrophy, rather than heterotrophy, was the more important factor in our study. We also observed no differences in temperature across the sites during the assay, and saw no differences in light levels in a previous study (Lenihan et al 2008), so we cannot attribute growth differences to these often-considered factors. Differences in coral growth among treatments were also closely associated with corallivore abundance and feeding behavior.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 70%
“…Coral bleaching also decreased with increasing coral height above the bottom and was correlated with current speed and sedimentation rate near our study site (Lenihan et al 2008). But greater availability of zooplankton prey may also mitigate bleaching Palardy et al 2008) suggesting that taller corals may have bleached less because they captured more zooplankton higher in the water column.…”
Section: Ecological Implicationsmentioning
confidence: 80%
“…Regions of the backreef that are most likely to experience low flow (0 to 7.7 cm s −1 ) are consistently the downstream sides of coral bommies (Brown 2012) and on short bommies (30 to 40 cm tall; Lenihan et al 2008), as well as within gaps or crevices. This study highlights how water flow mitigates potential chemical effects of algae on corals by decreasing the thickness of the DBL over the zone of interaction, likely rendering the chemical mechanisms underlying competition between corals and algae ineffective.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%