2018
DOI: 10.1103/physrevc.97.034908
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Reduction of the K* meson abundance in heavy ion collisions

Abstract: We study the K * meson reduction in heavy ion collisions by focusing on the hadronic effects on the K * meson abundance. We evaluate the absorption cross sections of the K * and K meson by light mesons in the hadronic matter, and further investigate the variation in the meson abundances for both particles during the hadronic stage of heavy ion collisions. We show how the interplay between the interaction of the K * meson and kaon with light mesons in the hadronic medium determines the final yield difference of… Show more

Help me understand this report
View preprint versions

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1

Citation Types

2
45
0
37

Year Published

2018
2018
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
5
2

Relationship

1
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 24 publications
(84 citation statements)
references
References 45 publications
2
45
0
37
Order By: Relevance
“…The scattering with defects, in particular, is expected to stronger influence the lifetime of excited states in contrast to the ground state, due to a smaller number of resonant final states for the later, necessary for elastic scattering. Similarly, spatial variations of the band gap due to dielectric disorder should also affect the resonance energy of the excited states by a larger degree due to reduced cancellation effects of the bandgap renormalization and binding energy [37], yielding an increasing inhomogeneous broadening with the quantum number n. Therefore, the small constant offset between the calculated intrinsic linewidth and the measured broadening of the 3s state of a few meV (Fig. 3 (c)) can be assigned to the presence of residual inhomogeneities potentially remaining in the hBN-encapsulated samples.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The scattering with defects, in particular, is expected to stronger influence the lifetime of excited states in contrast to the ground state, due to a smaller number of resonant final states for the later, necessary for elastic scattering. Similarly, spatial variations of the band gap due to dielectric disorder should also affect the resonance energy of the excited states by a larger degree due to reduced cancellation effects of the bandgap renormalization and binding energy [37], yielding an increasing inhomogeneous broadening with the quantum number n. Therefore, the small constant offset between the calculated intrinsic linewidth and the measured broadening of the 3s state of a few meV (Fig. 3 (c)) can be assigned to the presence of residual inhomogeneities potentially remaining in the hBN-encapsulated samples.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…We shall make use of the evolution equation for the abundances of particles included in processes discussed above. The momentum-integrated evolution equation has the form [37][38][39][40][41] …”
Section: Time Evolution Of the J/ψ Abundancementioning
confidence: 99%
“…We will assume that π,ρ,K,K * ,D, and D * are in equilibrium. Therefore, the density n i (τ ) can be written as [37][38][39][40][41] …”
Section: Time Evolution Of the J/ψ Abundancementioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…In addition to that, the Coulomb law adopts a nonconventional form, deviating from the reciprocal distance dependence due to the dielectric contrast between the material and its environment. [9][10][11][12][13] In the recent literature on the subject, these effects have been taken into account and the free carrier screening has been addressed theoretically using a variety of high-level many-particle calculations, [14][15][16][17][18][19][20] resulting in a number of accurate quantitative predictions and descriptions of the experimental findings. Nevertheless, it remains useful and instructive in this context to explicitly examine the applicability of the low-frequency screening approximation from basic analytical arguments and provide a transparent illustration of the underlying physics.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%