2018
DOI: 10.1007/s10439-018-02128-6
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Reduction of Pressure Gradient and Turbulence Using Vortex Generators in Prosthetic Heart Valves

Abstract: Blood damage and platelet activation are inherent problems with present day bi-leaflet mechanical heart valve designs. Passive flow control through different arrangements of vortex generators (VG) as means of improving pressure gradients and reducing turbulence are investigated. Rectangular VG arrays were mounted on the downstream surfaces of a 23 mm 3D printed mechanical valve. The effect of VGs on the resulting flow structures were assessed under pulsatile physiological flow conditions where high resolution … Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
15
0

Year Published

2019
2019
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
6
2

Relationship

1
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 23 publications
(16 citation statements)
references
References 43 publications
1
15
0
Order By: Relevance
“…In reality, the reported echocardiographic mean gradient derived from the aortic valve velocity accounts only for, and attributes all increased velocity to, convective acceleration that is assumed to be from a reduced area. In addition to omitting the proximal LVOT pressure, Bernoulli omits other causes of increased velocity as nonconvective variables (flow acceleration and viscous forces), pressure recovery, flow amount, and type between different valves 30 , 31 , 32 (laminar versus turbulent, single versus multiple zones of flow convergence in series, and long versus short valve frames). An elevated aortic velocity attributable to the aforementioned factors, apart from a true transaortic gradient from a reduced area, is attributed by echocardiography as convective acceleration and thus leads to an unpredictable overestimation of the mean gradient.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In reality, the reported echocardiographic mean gradient derived from the aortic valve velocity accounts only for, and attributes all increased velocity to, convective acceleration that is assumed to be from a reduced area. In addition to omitting the proximal LVOT pressure, Bernoulli omits other causes of increased velocity as nonconvective variables (flow acceleration and viscous forces), pressure recovery, flow amount, and type between different valves 30 , 31 , 32 (laminar versus turbulent, single versus multiple zones of flow convergence in series, and long versus short valve frames). An elevated aortic velocity attributable to the aforementioned factors, apart from a true transaortic gradient from a reduced area, is attributed by echocardiography as convective acceleration and thus leads to an unpredictable overestimation of the mean gradient.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The sinus radius of the aortic valve chamber is 19 mm, sinus height 21.6 mm, and aortic radius 12.7 mm. The chamber was set up into the aortic position of a left heart pulse duplicator flow loop as previously described in other publications [7,14,[27][28][29][30]. Sinus hemodynamics were assessed for each of the three leaflets through positioning the valve in all 3 possible positions in the aortic root model keeping the commissures aligned with those of the representative native model.…”
Section: Hemodynamic Assessmentmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…With the objective of minimising the risk for platelet activation and haemolysis, previous studies utilised passive control flow surfaces such as VGs (Murphy et al. 2010; Hatoum & Dasi 2019). Hatoum & Dasi (2019) documented through in-vitro experiments that the use of VGs allows one to mitigate turbulent stresses and reduce the transvalvular pressure drop.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%