2005
DOI: 10.1136/emj.2003.011809
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Reduction of dislocated hip prosthesis in the emergency department using conscious sedation: a prospective study

Abstract: This prospective observational study aimed to determine the rate of success of reduction of dislocated hip prostheses using conscious sedation. In 101 consecutive patients presenting to the emergency department between August 2000 and February 2003 with a dislocated hip prosthesis, reduction was attempted using conscious sedation. The outcome measures of the study were (a) rate of success of the attempted reductions (b) rate of complication of the sedation or the procedure, and (c) rate of success in the three… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1

Citation Types

4
35
1

Year Published

2009
2009
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
7
1

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 31 publications
(40 citation statements)
references
References 2 publications
4
35
1
Order By: Relevance
“…Two centres (Frenchay and RD&E) offered propofol sedation in the ED to some patients, although the selection criteria were not explored. The collective success rate for relocation with midazolam (64%) is in keeping with published experience 2. The apparently superior performance with propofol (96%) is considered in our companion paper 3…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 78%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Two centres (Frenchay and RD&E) offered propofol sedation in the ED to some patients, although the selection criteria were not explored. The collective success rate for relocation with midazolam (64%) is in keeping with published experience 2. The apparently superior performance with propofol (96%) is considered in our companion paper 3…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 78%
“…Relocation is traditionally performed under general anaesthesia in the operating theatre. Relocation using sedation in the emergency department (ED) has been reported previously,2 with a limited success rate of 62%. The same paper reported a mean time for attempted ED relocation of 1.83 h compared with 10.9 h for general anaesthesia in the theatre.…”
mentioning
confidence: 97%
“…Furthermore, they require a painful procedure to relocate their hip and may wait a mean of 7–11 h for relocation under theatre-based general anaesthesia in the UK 1 2. In contrast, early relocation in the ED promptly relieves the discomfort and periprosthetic tissue distortion.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This facilitates the performance of a procedure and allows for a certain degree of behaviour control. Frymann et al 2 identified five complications in a 101 patients sedated for emergency department (ED) relocation of hip prostheses using a combination of morphine and midazolam. In addition, Mathieu et al 6 reported that 12% of patients undergoing the procedure in the ED using propofol for sedation had sedation-related complications.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%