2021
DOI: 10.1088/1681-7575/abeccf
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Reduction of calibration uncertainty due to mounting of three-axis accelerometers using the intrinsic properties model

Abstract: We show that the calibration of tri-axis accelerometers based on the device’s intrinsic properties alleviates the uncertainty due to mounting misalignment in comparison to the use of the sensitivity matrix. The intrinsic properties of a tri-axis accelerometer are based on a (u, v, w) coordinate system that represent the direction of maximum sensitivities of each of the three accelerometers (U, V, W) and are assumed not to be perfectly orthogonal to each other. The calibration procedure requires rotation of the… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
22
0

Year Published

2021
2021
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 19 publications
(23 citation statements)
references
References 6 publications
1
22
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Some references take uncertainty as an index to evaluate proposed methods, such as [35,36]. As a consequence, the repeatability and uncertainty of method M2 is analyzed.…”
Section: Experiments and Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Some references take uncertainty as an index to evaluate proposed methods, such as [35,36]. As a consequence, the repeatability and uncertainty of method M2 is analyzed.…”
Section: Experiments and Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This means that systematic effects due to possible misalignments among sensing elements and differences among the proper sensitivities were negligible, at less than 1 dB. The complete description of the method to be applied for calculation can be found in [ 51 ]; in this application the misalignment was assessed in dynamic conditions in the gravity field instead of in static conditions.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In this way, it is possible to correct reference theoretical accelerations along MEMS axes in equations ( 1)-( 3), into a x , a y , a z of equations ( 5)- (7), where a x',syst , a y',syst , a z',syst and φ x',syst , φ y',syst , φ z',syst are, respectively, the amplitudes and the phase differences, with respect to the reference signal a ref , of the spurious components along x'-, y'-and z'-axis. The amplitude of spurious components is, as average, around 10% of the reference acceleration.…”
Section: Evaluation Of Systematic Effects and Correction Of The Refer...mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In the particular case of digital MEMS accelerometers, the sensitivity is generally provided by the manufacturer without traceable methods and is obtained in static conditions, whereas dynamic response, as a function of frequency, is often barely known or completely disregarded. On the other hand, traceable calibration methods for digital sensors, including sensitivity parameter and an appropriate uncertainty evaluation are necessary [1,6] in order to consider digital MEMS accelerometers as actual measurement devices in the frequency domain, in analogy to inertial 3-axis accelerometers, calibrated in the local gravitational field [7,8].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%