2003
DOI: 10.1046/j.1523-1755.63.s83.14.x
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Reduction in natural death and renal failure from a systematic screening and treatment program in an Australian Aboriginal community

Abstract: Falling rates of deaths and renal failure in the whole community support marked benefit of the program. Millions of dollars have been saved, based on avoidance of dialysis alone, but the reduction in premature death is the greater benefit. Chronic disease programs like this are enormously effective, and should be introduced into to all high-risk communities as a matter of urgency.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1

Citation Types

2
75
2

Year Published

2003
2003
2017
2017

Publication Types

Select...
6
3

Relationship

1
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 64 publications
(79 citation statements)
references
References 15 publications
2
75
2
Order By: Relevance
“…Although both programs recruit individuals based on their risk factors for CKD, the KEEP concentrates their efforts on black populations, while the SeeKD considered other ethnic groups (Aboriginal, Hispanic, South Asian, Asian, and African) as being a risk factor for CKD (22). Targeting individuals from high-risk ethnic groups is not uncommon given the disproportionate burden of ESRD among different ethnic groups, and such screening programs have been established in Australia (23) and Canada (24). Further, the KEEP used a limited number of risk factors (personal history of diabetes or hypertension, or a family history of diabetes, hypertension, or kidney disease) (12,22,25) compared with the SeeKD program (diabetes, hypertension, existing kidney problems, family history of kidney disease, member of high-risk ethnic population, current vascular disease, or currently using tobacco products).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Although both programs recruit individuals based on their risk factors for CKD, the KEEP concentrates their efforts on black populations, while the SeeKD considered other ethnic groups (Aboriginal, Hispanic, South Asian, Asian, and African) as being a risk factor for CKD (22). Targeting individuals from high-risk ethnic groups is not uncommon given the disproportionate burden of ESRD among different ethnic groups, and such screening programs have been established in Australia (23) and Canada (24). Further, the KEEP used a limited number of risk factors (personal history of diabetes or hypertension, or a family history of diabetes, hypertension, or kidney disease) (12,22,25) compared with the SeeKD program (diabetes, hypertension, existing kidney problems, family history of kidney disease, member of high-risk ethnic population, current vascular disease, or currently using tobacco products).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The use of historical controls to estimate treatment effect on terminal events is imperfect for several reasons (8), but trends in community-based deaths and renal failure supported the marked effect of the program. About 2 yr of treatment was required before reduction in all-cause natural death became apparent.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…We now summarize the results through June 30, 2000. The endpoint data are described in more detail in a separate manuscript (8).…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…So the options when establishing a prevention programme are to either screen an entire population, as in the Dutch PREVEND programme and the Australian Aboriginal CDOP studies or detect a cohort of people at the highest risk of disease ( Figure 4). (19,20) The approach in SA and other countries, like Australia, has been to focus more on the high risk population groups. (21,22) We have a few options to consider before starting a programme.…”
Section: Detection and Managementmentioning
confidence: 99%