2006
DOI: 10.1007/s00520-006-0128-4
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Reducing the unmet needs of patients with colorectal cancer: a feasibility study of The Pathfinder Volunteer Program

Abstract: The Pathfinder Program has been found to be feasible, acceptable for patients, and has the potential to reduce needs and depression. A larger, randomized controlled trial is needed to determine the impact of this program on colorectal symptoms and anxiety.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1

Citation Types

3
38
0
1

Year Published

2009
2009
2020
2020

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

1
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 39 publications
(56 citation statements)
references
References 17 publications
3
38
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…Surprisingly, "fears about cancer spreading and cancer returning" did not show among the ten highest needs like has been shown in other similar studies. [26][27][28] This result may be related to the fact that majority of our participants were recently diagnosed and that they may not think about recurrence so close to their initial diagnosis.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 91%
“…Surprisingly, "fears about cancer spreading and cancer returning" did not show among the ten highest needs like has been shown in other similar studies. [26][27][28] This result may be related to the fact that majority of our participants were recently diagnosed and that they may not think about recurrence so close to their initial diagnosis.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 91%
“…Psychological intervention has been integrated inside as an essential component. Various kinds of supportive care programmes have been developed and applied in cancer patients, some of which demonstrated positive effects (Macvean et al, 2007;Sussman et al, 2011;Yavuzsen et al, 2012).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…interventions have targeted patients with CRC during either the immediate post-operative period 29 (Young et al, 2010) or survivorship (Macvean et al, 2007;Siegel et al, 1992). Somewhat differently, 30 our study aimed to address the needs of those transitioning from active chemotherapy to post-31 treatment in line with clinical priorities identified by our study participants.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%