2015
DOI: 10.1016/j.energy.2015.09.112
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Reducing the carbon footprint of urban bus fleets using multi-objective optimization

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

0
12
0

Year Published

2017
2017
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
7
1

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 22 publications
(12 citation statements)
references
References 28 publications
0
12
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The Delphi approach was used in five instances to analyze the decision context while using AHP (Hsueh and Yan, 2011;Jain et al, 2014), WSM (Haruvy and Shalhevet, 2007;, and WASPAS for alternative comparison. Development was also found between MODM/SODM and other MCDA methods in four studies, where WSM Ribau et al, 2015;, ER , and PWV and GC helped select solutions resulting from optimization calculations. This was also stated as a reason for choosing these methods.…”
Section: Methods Combinationsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The Delphi approach was used in five instances to analyze the decision context while using AHP (Hsueh and Yan, 2011;Jain et al, 2014), WSM (Haruvy and Shalhevet, 2007;, and WASPAS for alternative comparison. Development was also found between MODM/SODM and other MCDA methods in four studies, where WSM Ribau et al, 2015;, ER , and PWV and GC helped select solutions resulting from optimization calculations. This was also stated as a reason for choosing these methods.…”
Section: Methods Combinationsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“… The use of aggregated process-based WTT inventories from literature or model databases [43,44] is prevalent in many studies, where the quantifiable environmental impact is used as a model input and not mapped for specific pathways [11,12,16,[19][20][21][45][46][47]. However, WTT environmental impacts are highly location specific and can vary with time, for example the GHG impacts of electric vehicles are dependent on grid composition, which can fluctuate daily and change significantly annually [7,48].…”
Section: Life Cycle Modelling Of Bus Technologiesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“… Although life cycle impacts can be significantly affected by operational factors, such as auxiliary loads [14,15,20,46] and drivetrain component replacement frequency [5,6,11,17,24,25,49], many models use static inputs of fuel economy [13,17,21,23,42,50] and battery replacements [9][10][11]17,46]. However, other research has used vehicle simulation models that are sensitive to varying input parameters to predict the fuel or energy consumption, costs and emissions criteria over a drive cycle [5,6,11,14,46,49]. Further developments have integrated the simulation models into life cycle models to calculate battery replacements [5,6,49].…”
Section: Life Cycle Modelling Of Bus Technologiesmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Thomas Wiedmann and Jan Minx [21] proposed a scientific definition for carbon footprint: a measure of the exclusive total amount of carbon dioxide emissions that are directly or indirectly caused by an activity or are accumulated over the life stages of a product. Numerous studies have proposed different ways of calculating the carbon footprint, as well as analyzed the factors influencing GHG emissions [22][23][24][25][26][27][28][29][30]. One study, for example, analyzed the carbon footprint of eight categories of products and services: construction, shelter, food, clothing, mobility, manufactured products, services, and trade [31].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%