Reducing Resistance to Sponsorship Disclosure: The Role of Experiential Versus Material Posts

Abstract

Despite the growing relevance of influencer marketing, recent research suggests that consumers have negative reactions to social media ads. Our research investigates how different types of disclosure (paid partnership vs. in-text disclosure) and post content (experiential vs. material) mitigate consumers’ negative reactions to social media advertisements. Four preregistered studies, drawing on the social exchange theory, reveal how the post content shapes the sponsorship disclosure effects. In particular, we show that a paid partnership (vs. in-text) disclosure has a positive impact on consumers’ responses (engagement and purchase intent) and that persuasion resistance mediates the effects. Furthermore, Study 3 reveals that the type of content (experiential vs. material) moderates the effect, such that consumers’ negative reactions to sponsorship disclosure are mitigated with experiential (vs. material) content. Overall, our results provide actionable implications for tourism marketers on how to create advertisements in social media, minimizing negative reactions to sponsorship disclosure.

Emojis as heuristic cues: The multifaceted role of emojis in online service interactions

“…This study employed a content analysis procedure adapted from Karagür et al (2022) and Shuqair et al (2023). Content analysis is an effective tool in marketing as it overcomes self-reported measures (e.g., Davis et al, 2011).…”

Tobacco, nicotine and counter-marketing promotions using Instagram’s branded content tool

“…Formal disclosure statements may also enhance credibility and increase purchase intent relative to informal hashtag-based disclosures. [4][5][6][7] Although disclosures, particularly via platform tools, should 'facilitate enforcement' of prohibitions on tobacco content, 8 enforcement practices remain an open question. Understanding how these tools are used for tobacco/nicotine product promotion, as well as the efficacy of current self-regulation, is critical to inform regulatory guidance, federal marketing restrictions and counter-marketing priorities.…”