2006
DOI: 10.1117/12.681743
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Reducing process contributions to CD error range using the Sigma7500 pattern generator and ProcessEqualizerTM

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
3
0

Year Published

2006
2006
2009
2009

Publication Types

Select...
5

Relationship

2
3

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 5 publications
(3 citation statements)
references
References 17 publications
0
3
0
Order By: Relevance
“…radial error from the developer. The following two sections provide a general description of ProcessEqualizer, but it is described in more technical detail in a previous paper 9 . As with all compensation methods, it requires the possibility of predicting CD variations before the pattern is printed.…”
Section: Funtional Descriptionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…radial error from the developer. The following two sections provide a general description of ProcessEqualizer, but it is described in more technical detail in a previous paper 9 . As with all compensation methods, it requires the possibility of predicting CD variations before the pattern is printed.…”
Section: Funtional Descriptionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Global and local loading effects especially during plasma etching [3][4][5][6] , but also to a lesser degree during develop 7,8 , have gained increased interest in the mask community recently. With the ProcessEqualizer function 9 , the Sigma7500 provides a means of compensating for static process CD signatures as well as pattern-density dependent CD errors arising from mask developing and dry etching.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Global and local loading effects, especially during plasma etching, but also to a lesser degree during develop, have recently gained increased attention in the mask community. With the ProcessEqualizer™ function 6,7 , the Sigma7500 provides a means of compensating for static process CD signatures as well as pattern-density dependent CD errors arising from mask developing and dry etching.…”
Section: Bias Functionsmentioning
confidence: 99%