2005
DOI: 10.1016/j.jwb.2005.05.004
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Reducing inpatriate managers’ ‘Liability of Foreignness’ by addressing stigmatization and stereotype threats

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

0
74
0

Year Published

2010
2010
2020
2020

Publication Types

Select...
7
1

Relationship

1
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 119 publications
(74 citation statements)
references
References 45 publications
0
74
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The disadvantages that immigrants encounter when competing against natives in the labor market of natives' country of citizenship may be hypothesized to reflect immigrant "liability-of-foreignness" (i.e., LOF; Harvey, Novicevic, Buckley, & Fung, 2005). The main assumption of this LOF hypothesis is that immigrants, facing the liability of being foreign when pursuing job opportunities in the labor market of a country that is not their own country of citizenship, will likely lack legitimacy and therefore achieve significantly lower levels of job success than natives when searching for jobs in 3 the local labor market (Brekke & Mastekaasa, 2008;Constant, Kahanec & Zimmermann, 2009;Millar & Choi, 2008).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The disadvantages that immigrants encounter when competing against natives in the labor market of natives' country of citizenship may be hypothesized to reflect immigrant "liability-of-foreignness" (i.e., LOF; Harvey, Novicevic, Buckley, & Fung, 2005). The main assumption of this LOF hypothesis is that immigrants, facing the liability of being foreign when pursuing job opportunities in the labor market of a country that is not their own country of citizenship, will likely lack legitimacy and therefore achieve significantly lower levels of job success than natives when searching for jobs in 3 the local labor market (Brekke & Mastekaasa, 2008;Constant, Kahanec & Zimmermann, 2009;Millar & Choi, 2008).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In this regard, following Harvey, Novecevic, and Speier (2000), we use the term inpatriate to represent employees from multinational subsidiaries transferred to the HQ on a permanent or semi-permanent basis. Much of the extant research in this area has been conceptual in nature (Harvey, Buckley, & Fung, 2005;Harvey et al, 2000) and there has been relatively little empirical work (for exceptions, see Harvey & Miceli, 1999;Peterson, 2003;Reiche, 2006;Tharenou & Harvey, 2006). While these studies have considered issues including inter alia, acculturation issues of inpatriate managers (Harvey & Miceli, 1999), and the purposes and critical success factors of such assignments (Reiche, 2006), there is little, if any, available evidence on the extent to which MNEs actually utilize inpatriate assignments 1 (cf.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Most companies pay their expatriates according to the wage structure of the employees' country of origin (KPMG, 2012, p. 31), although this can still put employees at a disadvantage, such as when employees who are working in another time zone are expected to work overtime because of the time difference, or when they are expected to use work practices that are not managed appropriately by using a transparent time account system. Intransnational organizations with a pronounced center-periphery structure, actors from the periphery might also be stigmatized or discriminated against; after all, such behavior would reflect the dominant transnational status structure and social structure within the organization (Harvey et al, 2005). In addition, employees from the periphery are often seen as competitors.…”
Section: Types Of Transnational Labor Mobilitymentioning
confidence: 99%