Reducing Inequalities within Countries: Assessing the Potential of the Sustainable Development Goals

Abstract

Income and wealth inequality are rising in most countries around the world today. Recognising that this challenge has become a universal issue, the United Nations agreed in 2015 to seventeen Sustainable Development Goals (SDGs), as part of a global agenda to transform society. Specifically, SDG Target 10 commits countries to 'reduce inequalities within and among countries'. To what extent SDGs and in particular SDG target 10 can help nations reverse inequality towards a downward trend is the question we address in this paper. To answer this question, we build on the theory of change underpinning the goal-based governance characterising the SDGs, then we infer the added value of the SDGs along three criteria: the production of a common metric, the capacity to emulate peer pressure, and policy learning within and across countries. Across these three criteria, our main finding is that there is much that states can take away from the SDGs to address the problem of rising inequality, though success is conditional on achieving the buy-in of key actors and epistemic communities for which domestic inequalities remains a domestic issue and not a global sustainability one. Policy Implications• There is much that states can take away from the SDGs to address the problem of rising inequality, though success is conditional on achieving the buy-in of key actors and epistemic communities for which domestic inequalities remains a domestic issue and not a global sustainability one• The first major contribution of the SDGs is the old clich e, 'what gets measured gets done'. The guarantee of standardized, comparable statistics is likely to serve as a catalyst for political action to reduce inequality. At the very least, it serves as an enabler for civil society and other non-government institutions to hold governments to account.• Second, and relatedly, the SDGs create a forum in which countries' performances are ranked against each other. The SDGs enable us to distinguish between those countries that are performing well and those falling behind, while serving to remind political leaders that inequality reduction is not just necessary but possible.

Socioeconomic inequality in short birth interval in Ethiopia: a decomposition analysis

“…As a result, addressing health inequality has become a top priority intervention area for international organizations such as the World Health Organization (WHO) [ 8 , 9 ], the United Nations Development Programme [ 10 ], and the World Bank [ 11 ]. For instance, one of the Sustainable Development Goals (SDGs) set by the United Nations (i.e., Goal 10) aims to reduce inequality within and among countries [ 12 , 13 ]. Monitoring health inequalities help countries track their progress towards the SDG and ensure their disadvantaged or hard-to-reach populations are not left behind [ 14 , 15 ].…”

SDG 3 and financing instruments in Austria and Ukraine: Challenges and perspectives

“…Based on Chancel et al (2018), the individual scores and the resulting rankings from Table 3 can be used to compare the performance of tar-…”

Estimación de la función de bienestar social de Amartya Sen para América Latina

“…Al tener un panel de datos con T>N y considerando las características del conjunto de variables en el modelo econométrico planteado en [11], es posible segmentar también los análisis de corto y largo plazo bajo la metodología de Engle y Granger (1987) y extender el análisis a la cointegración de paneles (McCoskey & Kao, 1998). De hecho, la ecuación [11] -al tener solamente valores contemporáneos en el tiempo-se puede entender como la relación de largo plazo entre las variables de análisis, que se encuentran con la característica de poseer raíces unitarias en niveles pero estacionarias en primeras diferencias, definiendo un conjunto I(1) de acuerdo con las pruebas de raíces unitarias de primera y segunda generación (véase anexo B).…”

“…La necesidad de discutir, analizar y estudiar esta problemática mantiene su vigencia en la actualidad, dado que los patrones de concentración del ingreso han tendido a incrementarse a lo largo del mundo en pleno siglo XXI (Berman et al, 2016;Chancel et al, 2017;Piketty, 2013), afectando los niveles de bienestar social (McGillivray & Markova, 2010). Esta cuestión, por su nivel de complejidad, debe considerar investigaciones separadas para economías homogéneas en términos del nivel de desarrollo económico.…”