Our system is currently under heavy load due to increased usage. We're actively working on upgrades to improve performance. Thank you for your patience.
2013
DOI: 10.1016/j.prevetmed.2013.02.017
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Reducing Eurasian wild boar (Sus scrofa) population density as a measure for bovine tuberculosis control: Effects in wild boar and a sympatric fallow deer (Dama dama) population in Central Spain

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
19
0

Year Published

2013
2013
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
8
1

Relationship

1
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 33 publications
(19 citation statements)
references
References 47 publications
0
19
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Similarly, Boadella, Vicente, Ruiz‐Fons, de la Fuente, and Gortázar () established that culling of at least 50% of the estimated wild boar population allowed a reduction in TB prevalence by 21%–48% in 2 to 3 years. Wild boar culling, as well as other management practices such as segregating wild ungulates and livestock, has proven to be effective to decrease TB prevalence not only in wild boar, but also in sympatric wild and domestic species (Boadella et al., ; Barasona, VerCauteren, Saklou, Gortázar, & Vicente, ; García‐Jiménez et al., ). In this context, the proper disposal of hunting by‐products could have an indirect positive effect on the health status of livestock, particularly in areas with high wildlife–livestock interactions.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Similarly, Boadella, Vicente, Ruiz‐Fons, de la Fuente, and Gortázar () established that culling of at least 50% of the estimated wild boar population allowed a reduction in TB prevalence by 21%–48% in 2 to 3 years. Wild boar culling, as well as other management practices such as segregating wild ungulates and livestock, has proven to be effective to decrease TB prevalence not only in wild boar, but also in sympatric wild and domestic species (Boadella et al., ; Barasona, VerCauteren, Saklou, Gortázar, & Vicente, ; García‐Jiménez et al., ). In this context, the proper disposal of hunting by‐products could have an indirect positive effect on the health status of livestock, particularly in areas with high wildlife–livestock interactions.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…These types of estimations may be useful in the populations under study as they were not biased by hunting restrictions in the number, sex or age of the animals. In addition, all of the estates were managed under similar hunting techniques (Fernández‐Llario et al., ; García‐Jiménez et al., ). Relative density of wild boar in the estates ranged between 6.5 and 32 wild boar per 100 ha (Table ).…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…A major reduction in deer density at Brotonne, France, resulted in an eventual reduction in TB prevalence in wild red deer (Hars et al 2010 ), implying maintenance host status in that case, but wild boar densities were also reduced so the cause and the effect in this situation are not entirely clear. In Spain, reduction in wild boar numbers in a 30 km 2 hunting estate resulted in modest decreases in TB prevalence among a high density (30–80 deer/km 2 ) sympatric fallow deer herd (García-Jiménez et al 2013 ), suggesting that the deer were acting primarily as spillover hosts, even at those high densities. Similarly, in another Spanish study, reductions in wild boar density were inferred to have resulted in reduced infection in sympatric red deer (Boadella et al 2012 ).…”
Section: Ecology and Epidemiology Of Tb In Wild Deer And Feral Pigsmentioning
confidence: 99%