2018
DOI: 10.5539/jas.v10n3p1
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Reducing CO2 Flux by Decreasing Tillage in Ohio: Overcoming Conjecture with Data

Abstract: While the literature is clear about excessive tillage decreasing soil carbon (C) content, there are few experimental studies that document the comparative effects of soil and crop management on C sequestration. Using micrometeorology we measured CO 2 flux from a maize crop grown on both no-till and tilled soils in north-central Ohio. We used Bowen Ratio Energy Balance (BREB) systems to quantify the flux between the atmosphere and either the soil surface (at crop planting) or 0.2 m above the canopy once the cro… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
6
0

Year Published

2019
2019
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
4
1

Relationship

4
1

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 5 publications
(6 citation statements)
references
References 49 publications
0
6
0
Order By: Relevance
“…If it were assumed that CO 2 flux measured at night is similar to the respiration that occurs during the day (i.e., ER), then we could provide a first‐order estimate of GPP by subtracting nighttime respiration (i.e., nighttime NEE) from daytime NEE as presented by O'Dell et al, (2018). This is shown in Table 3 for both treatments, which provides the average monthly daytime NEE from 1000 and 1600 h and the average nighttime NEE between 2200 and 0400 h. The rate of ecosystem photosynthesis during the day could be compared between the two treatments by the daytime NEE minus nighttime NEE.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…If it were assumed that CO 2 flux measured at night is similar to the respiration that occurs during the day (i.e., ER), then we could provide a first‐order estimate of GPP by subtracting nighttime respiration (i.e., nighttime NEE) from daytime NEE as presented by O'Dell et al, (2018). This is shown in Table 3 for both treatments, which provides the average monthly daytime NEE from 1000 and 1600 h and the average nighttime NEE between 2200 and 0400 h. The rate of ecosystem photosynthesis during the day could be compared between the two treatments by the daytime NEE minus nighttime NEE.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Five‐second measurements were averaged over successive 5‐min intervals by the BREB systems and used to calculate 30‐min mean CO 2 flux according to BREB system theory (Bowen, 1926; Dugas, 1993; Kanemasu et al, 1979; Tanner, 1960; Webb et al, 1980) using the approach as reported by O'Dell et al (2018). Five‐minute water vapor pressure and temperature differences were averaged over 30‐min intervals to calculate the Bowen ratio, which was then used to calculate latent energy and sensible heat fluxes.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Carbon dioxide flux was calculated according to methods described in O'Dell et al (2018) as the product of the turbulent diffusivity for CO 2 flux (assumed to be equal to K H ) and the average difference of CO 2 density between the two measurement heights. The flux was corrected for vapor pressure and temperature differences at the two measurement heights according to Webb et al (1980).…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Figure 2 shows the layout of the field site of the Ohio study of 2015 (O'Dell et al., 2018). Above each of two test plots, measurements were made of the concentration of CO 2 in air, the air temperature and vapor pressure at two levels close to the surface, wind speed, and the surface temperature as reported by downward looking infrared thermometers.…”
Section: The Ohio Co2 Studymentioning
confidence: 99%