The platform will undergo maintenance on Sep 14 at about 7:45 AM EST and will be unavailable for approximately 2 hours.
2019
DOI: 10.2134/age2019.02.0008
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Nutrient Source and Tillage Effects on Maize: I. Micrometeorological Methods for Measuring Carbon Dioxide Emissions

Abstract: Core Ideas Aerodynamic methods can be used to gap‐fill Bowen ratio energy balance micrometeorological measurements. Eddy covariance and Bowen ratio energy balance methods agree during turbulent daytime conditions. Measuring nighttime net ecosystem exchange is challenging using turbulence‐based micrometeorology. There is a need to understand the potential benefits of using the biotechnology waste by‐product from manufacturing as a fertilizer replacement in agriculture, by quantifying the economic value for th… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1

Citation Types

0
1
0
1

Year Published

2019
2019
2020
2020

Publication Types

Select...
2

Relationship

1
1

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 2 publications
(2 citation statements)
references
References 45 publications
(77 reference statements)
0
1
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…Both eddy covariance (EC) and Bowen ratio energy balance systems were used to measure micrometeorological and soil properties between 1 Oct. 2016 and 30 Sept. 2017 as described in Part 1 of this series (O'Dell et al, 2019). For the purposes of this study, the EC method was selected for comparing the CO 2 emission between the two treatments, though more information describing specific differences observed between these two micrometeorological approaches can be found in O'Dell et al (2019). Eddy covariance stations were located near the center of each plot with the instrument on the FP plot positioned 155 m from the southern edge of the field and 60 m S of the edge of the SMB plot.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Both eddy covariance (EC) and Bowen ratio energy balance systems were used to measure micrometeorological and soil properties between 1 Oct. 2016 and 30 Sept. 2017 as described in Part 1 of this series (O'Dell et al, 2019). For the purposes of this study, the EC method was selected for comparing the CO 2 emission between the two treatments, though more information describing specific differences observed between these two micrometeorological approaches can be found in O'Dell et al (2019). Eddy covariance stations were located near the center of each plot with the instrument on the FP plot positioned 155 m from the southern edge of the field and 60 m S of the edge of the SMB plot.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…势是可以进行原位无干扰的连续观测, 而且在单点 上观测的通量信号是通量贡献区内不同位置地面通 量的加权平均 (Baldocchi et al, 1988) (Baldocchi et al, 2001;Baldocchi, 2014 (Simpson et al, 1995(Simpson et al, , 1998Miyata et al, 2000;Griffis et al, 2004;Pattey et al, 2006;Santos et al, 2012;Xiao et al, 2014;Laubach et al, 2016;Karlsson, 2017;O'Dell et al, 2019;Zhao et al, 2019) 的观测研究中。此外, 通量梯度法也被用于其他痕 量气体的通量观测, 如森林内外的H 2 通量 (Meredith et al, 2014)、草地气态汞通量 (Fritsche et al, 2008) 和大气汞循环研究 (Angot et al, 2016 (Baldocchi et al, 1988;Lee, 2018), 在近地边界层内对质量守恒的连 续方程进行一阶闭合假设, 可以得到湍流协方差项, 即湍流通量项等于物质浓度梯度与湍流扩散系数的 乘积 (Baldocchi et al, 1988;Lee, 2018), (Griffis et al, 2004), (Businger, 1986;Meyers et al, 1996), 计算公式为: Businger, 1986;Meyers et al, 1996) (Meyers et al, 1996;Xiao et al, 2014;Zhao et al, 2019)…”
unclassified