2011
DOI: 10.1016/j.jss.2009.11.730
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Reduced α-Dystroglycan Expression Correlates with Shortened Patient Survival in Pancreatic Cancer

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

2
14
0

Year Published

2011
2011
2016
2016

Publication Types

Select...
7
1

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 16 publications
(16 citation statements)
references
References 27 publications
2
14
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The difference of β-DG expression between each group was statistically significant except for groups between metastatic lymph node and distal metastatic site. Regarding the relationship between β-DG and patients survival, the difference of β-DG expression between tumor and normal tissues was not associated with patient survival, this result was the same as reported by Jiang XJ et al [17], who demonstrated that the median survival time in patients with low expression of β-DG was not significantly different as compared to the patients with high expression of β-DG in pancreatic cancer.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 86%
“…The difference of β-DG expression between each group was statistically significant except for groups between metastatic lymph node and distal metastatic site. Regarding the relationship between β-DG and patients survival, the difference of β-DG expression between tumor and normal tissues was not associated with patient survival, this result was the same as reported by Jiang XJ et al [17], who demonstrated that the median survival time in patients with low expression of β-DG was not significantly different as compared to the patients with high expression of β-DG in pancreatic cancer.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 86%
“…Consistent with the idea that ␣DG hypoglycosylation is associated with a more aggressive disease phenotype, hypoglycosylation of ␣DG has, in some small retrospective studies, demonstrated potential prognostic value in predicting disease recurrence or survival (54,(57)(58)(59)(60). Prior work in prostate cancer demonstrated that ␣DG hypoglycosylation is associated with increasing Gleason score (46,47).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 71%
“…Staining scores for these markers were calculated by multiplying the staining intensity score (0 = no staining, 1 = weak or moderate, 2 = strong) in a given tumoral area by the stained area score (1< one‐third, 2 = between one‐ and two‐thirds, 3> two‐thirds) as previously described 17. The total immunohistochemical score (0–6) was expressed as the product of the intensity and area scores.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%