1998
DOI: 10.1038/35596
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Reduced sensitivity of recent tree-growth to temperature at high northern latitudes

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

41
492
6
7

Year Published

2004
2004
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
7
2

Relationship

1
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 680 publications
(546 citation statements)
references
References 23 publications
41
492
6
7
Order By: Relevance
“…In both situations, statistical relationships, which may represent linearizations of nonlinear processes (see section 2), are difficult to validate for long period processes and for times outside the instrumental era and may not hold for paleoclimate or climate change experiments. For example, the application of statistical calibrations to an independent time period with a fundamentally different climatic regime, for example, with comparable temperatures but a general shift in water balance, may consequently lead to an erroneous climate reconstruction [LaMarche et al, 1984;Graybill and Idso, 1993;Briffa et al, 1998;Vaganov et al, 1999;Barber et al, 2000;Kirdyanov et al, 2003;Anchukaitis et al, 2006]. Hence the nature of trees as a biological archive of environmental conditions raises questions about the validity of linear, statistical approaches to interpretation of the data.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In both situations, statistical relationships, which may represent linearizations of nonlinear processes (see section 2), are difficult to validate for long period processes and for times outside the instrumental era and may not hold for paleoclimate or climate change experiments. For example, the application of statistical calibrations to an independent time period with a fundamentally different climatic regime, for example, with comparable temperatures but a general shift in water balance, may consequently lead to an erroneous climate reconstruction [LaMarche et al, 1984;Graybill and Idso, 1993;Briffa et al, 1998;Vaganov et al, 1999;Barber et al, 2000;Kirdyanov et al, 2003;Anchukaitis et al, 2006]. Hence the nature of trees as a biological archive of environmental conditions raises questions about the validity of linear, statistical approaches to interpretation of the data.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In a longer temporal context than the satellite period, tree-ring studies have shown that the growth of boreal trees in some cool and relatively moist northern locations has not continued to track rising temperature trends since around the 1960s, whereas they had previously shown positive responses to summer warming, such as in the early part of the 20th century [24][25][26]. This recent temporal change in the apparent positive response of tree growth to warming is known in the tree-ring community as the "divergence" phenomenon.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…On the other hand, since the growth and development of trees are affected by environmental factors, wood physical traits are inevitably affected by climatic and edaphic factors [17,18,43]. Analyses of GLM indicated that the relationships between climatic factors and wood physical properties were inconsistent after removing the effect of life form: wood density was more affected by temperature, dry shrinkage coefficient was more affected by precipitation, whereas resilience was affected by both temperature and precipitation.…”
Section: Factors Controlling Geographical Pattern Of Chinese Wood Phymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…A number of studies have reported the distribution, pattern of wood physical properties and their influencing factors on regional scale [1012, 18,19]. However, these studies generally focus on density and ignore other wood properties such as dry shrinkage coefficient, resilience and strength.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%