2000
DOI: 10.1046/j.1365-3059.2000.00488.x
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Reduced sensitivity of Cercospora beticola isolates to sterol‐demethylation‐inhibiting fungicides

Abstract: In a survey conducted during October 1995, single-lesion isolates of the sugar beet leaf-spot fungus, Cercospora beticola, were tested for sensitivity to the sterol demethylation inhibiting fungicides (DMIs) flutriafol and bitertanol. The isolates were collected from fields in three different areas of northern Greece. Fields at Serres and Imathia had been sprayed with DMIs for about 15 years to control sugar beet leaf-spot. At the third site, Amyndeon, DMI fungicides had not been used. From each area 150 isola… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

4
43
0
1

Year Published

2005
2005
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
9
1

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 93 publications
(51 citation statements)
references
References 18 publications
(20 reference statements)
4
43
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…Experimental designs must allow for measurement of immigration of sensitive or resistant individuals from neighbouring crops. Although monitoring a mixture of azoxystrobin resistant and sensitive isolates of Magnaporthe oryzae inoculated on ryegrass Lolium perenne (Ma & Uddin 2009), and the frequency of azole resistance in Cercospora beticola during an epidemic (Karaoglanidis et al 2001), both indicated a fitness penalty linked to resistance. In general, many similar studies have not found a significant fitness penalty associated with resistance (e.g.…”
Section: Managing Resistance In Cropsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Experimental designs must allow for measurement of immigration of sensitive or resistant individuals from neighbouring crops. Although monitoring a mixture of azoxystrobin resistant and sensitive isolates of Magnaporthe oryzae inoculated on ryegrass Lolium perenne (Ma & Uddin 2009), and the frequency of azole resistance in Cercospora beticola during an epidemic (Karaoglanidis et al 2001), both indicated a fitness penalty linked to resistance. In general, many similar studies have not found a significant fitness penalty associated with resistance (e.g.…”
Section: Managing Resistance In Cropsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Isolates resistant to the benzimidazoles appeared in the early of 1970s resulting in complete failure of disease control (Georgopoulos and Dovas, 1973;Weiland and Halloin, 2001). The replacement of benzimidazoles with the triazole fungicides was only a temporary solution to the problem because in the last 10 years triazole-resistant isolates were also reported (Karaoglanidis et al, 2000). The organotin fungicide fentin-acetate, which was used in the anti-resistance strategies was withdrawn and the use of the dithiocarbamate maneb may eventually be restricted.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Resistance has been reported in other growing regions (Karaoglanidis et al, 2000, Secor et al, 2010, Trkulja et al, 2015. Field resistance of C. beticola to DMI fungicides poses a challenge for sugar beet production in Ontario due to favourable conditions for disease and the presence of QoI-insensitive C. beticola in the same growing region (Trueman et al, 2013), leaving copper and ethylene bisdithiocarbamate fungicides as the only effective tools for disease management.…”
Section: Figurementioning
confidence: 99%