“…Furthermore, we aimed to classify these calls into different types, based on observational methods and by means of spectrographic features, since previous studies have shown that pup USV may be assigned to different types, which, dependent on the method, may range between 2 and 13 types (e.g., Brudzynski et al, , Hashimoto, Moritani, Aoki‐Komori, Tanaka, & Saito, ; Zeskind et al, ). While such previous classifications are based on visual inspection of spectrograms, primarily focusing on call shapes, we aimed for a different, and probably less subjective, classification by means of a quantitative approach including acoustic features, such as frequency modulation, peak frequency, and call duration, previously applied in mouse pups (Mosienko, Beis, Alenina, & Wöhr, ; Sungur, Schwarting, & Wöhr, ; Wöhr, ; Wöhr et al, ). Defining call types is important, since certain ones may specifically be affected, for example, by pre‐ or neonatal manipulations (Barren & Gilbertson ; Harmon et al, ; Krüger & Hanganu‐Opatz, ; Tonkiss et al, ), and it is reasonable to assume that different genetic backgrounds, like in the three outbred stocks, may also affect them.…”