No abstract

Mice and rats emit and perceive calls in the ultrasonic range, i.e., above the human hearing threshold of about 20 kHz: so-called ultrasonic vocalizations (USV). Juvenile and adult rats emit 22-kHz USV in aversive situations, such as predator exposure and fighting or during drug withdrawal, whereas 50-kHz USV occur in appetitive situations, such as rough-and-tumble play and mating or in response to drugs of abuse, e.g., amphetamine. Aversive 22-kHz USV and appetitive 50-kHz USV serve distinct communicative functions. Whereas 22-kHz USV induce freezing behavior in the receiver, 50-kHz USV lead to social approach behavior. These opposite behavioral responses are paralleled by distinct patterns of brain activation. Freezing behavior in response to 22-kHz USV is paralleled by increased neuronal activity in brain areas regulating fear and anxiety, such as the amygdala and periaqueductal gray, whereas social approach behavior elicited by 50-kHz USV is accompanied by reduced activity levels in the amygdala but enhanced activity in the nucleus accumbens, a brain area implicated in reward processing. These opposing behavioral responses, together with distinct patterns of brain activation, particularly the bidirectional tonic activation or deactivation of the amygdala elicited by 22-kHz and 50-kHz USV, respectively, concur with a wealth of behavioral and neuroimaging studies in humans involving emotionally salient stimuli, such as fearful and happy facial expressions. Affective ultrasonic communication therefore offers a translational tool for studying the neurobiology underlying socio-affective communication. This is particularly relevant for rodent models of neurodevelopmental disorders characterized by social and communication deficits, such as autism and schizophrenia.

No abstract

No abstract

Rats can emit ultrasonic 50-kHz vocalizations which are generally assumed to reflect the animals' positive emotional state. However, some aspects question the reliability of 50-kHz calls as indicators of positive affective states. Firstly, rats also emit them in novel environments containing scents of other rats, or even while being victims of intra-species aggression. Secondly, huge inter-individual variability in call production can be observed. The present two studies were conducted to further determine factors other than reward, which may influence or even induce calling. Experiment A showed that 50-kHz calls were emitted in relatively high numbers during short isolation in test cages, and, to a lesser extent, also during testing in an open field and an elevated plus maze. Despite inter-individual variability, calling behavior was individually stable over days and occurred irrespective of whether rats were tested in a cage with or without familiar rat scents. These data indicate that 50-kHz calling is not necessarily a response to the presence of pleasurable or social stimuli. Additionally, it was observed that call emission during isolation is strongly affected by prior experience. Rats that had been trained repeatedly in an appetitive discrimination task emitted only few calls during short isolation in test cages, whereas naïve rats emitted high numbers of 50-kHz calls which decreased over time. The most likely explanation is that rats call in response to separation from the cage mate, as the first group was trained before the recordings, while the naïve rats were recorded immediately after separation. This explanation was supported by Experiment B, which showed that the rats that remained alone in the home cage also called at 50 kHz after separation from the cage mates. In both experiments, most of the 50-kHz calls were not frequency modulated, which lend support for the suggestion that this subtype has a social-coordinating function. The present findings urge sophisticated spectrographic analysis of ultrasonic vocalizations and caution when interpreting 50-kHz vocalizations, since specific subtypes of these calls can occur in contexts that are not necessarily pleasurable to rats, and are affected by prior experience and huge individual differences.

Rats emit distinct types of ultrasonic vocalizations, which differ depending on age, the subject's current state and environmental factors. Since it was shown that 50-kHz calls can serve as indices of the animal's positive subjective state, they have received increasing experimental attention, and have successfully been used to study neurobiological mechanisms of positive affect. However, it is likely that such calls do not only reflect a positive affective state, but that they also serve a communicative purpose. Actually, rats emit the highest rates of 50-kHz calls typically during social interactions, like reproductive behavior, juvenile play and tickling. Furthermore, it was recently shown that rats emit 50-kHz calls after separation from conspecifics. The aim of the present study was to test the communicative value of such 50-kHz calls. In a first experiment, conducted in juvenile rats situated singly on a radial maze apparatus, we showed that 50-kHz calls can induce behavioral activation and approach responses, which were selective to 50-kHz signals, since presentation of 22-kHz calls, considered to be aversive or threat signals, led to behavioral inhibition. In two other experiments, we used either natural 50-kHz calls, which had been previously recorded from other rats, or artificial sine wave stimuli, which were identical to these calls with respect to peak frequency, call length and temporal appearance. These signals were presented to either juvenile (Exp. 2) or adult (Exp. 3) male rats. Our data clearly show that 50-kHz signals can induce approach behavior, an effect, which was more pronounced in juvenile rats and which was not selective to natural calls, especially in adult rats. The recipient rats also emitted some 50-kHz calls in response to call presentation, but this effect was observed only in adult subjects. Together, our data show that 50-kHz calls can serve communicative purposes, namely as a social signal, which increases the likelihood of approach in the recipient conspecific.

No abstract

Learning theory, attentional processes, social influences, and biological determinants contribute to the development, persistence, and modification of expectancies. Psychological interventions should focus on optimizing expectation violation to achieve optimal treatment outcome and to avoid treatment failures.