2008
DOI: 10.1021/nl8013007
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Reduced Graphene Oxide Molecular Sensors

Abstract: ABSTRACT

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

15
1,095
2
19

Year Published

2009
2009
2016
2016

Publication Types

Select...
5
3

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 1,671 publications
(1,156 citation statements)
references
References 22 publications
15
1,095
2
19
Order By: Relevance
“…A constant response of 40% with a variation of 4.1% was observed when the sensor was exposed to a saturated methanol vapor for three successive cycles, indicating good repeatability and stability (Figure 5a,b). The response displayed by this 3D S‐RGOH sensor to organic vapors is comparable to that of the previous reported RGO/Gr‐based sensors 14, 20, 27, 41. Compared with its unmodified counterpart, the S‐RGOH sensor exhibits more than two orders of magnitude higher responses to these organic vapors,27 demonstrating the effectiveness of chemical functionalization in improving its sensitivity.…”
Section: Resultssupporting
confidence: 85%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…A constant response of 40% with a variation of 4.1% was observed when the sensor was exposed to a saturated methanol vapor for three successive cycles, indicating good repeatability and stability (Figure 5a,b). The response displayed by this 3D S‐RGOH sensor to organic vapors is comparable to that of the previous reported RGO/Gr‐based sensors 14, 20, 27, 41. Compared with its unmodified counterpart, the S‐RGOH sensor exhibits more than two orders of magnitude higher responses to these organic vapors,27 demonstrating the effectiveness of chemical functionalization in improving its sensitivity.…”
Section: Resultssupporting
confidence: 85%
“…The good reversibility displayed by this 3D S‐RGOH‐based NO 2 sensor is different from those of RGO and carbon nanotube based NO 2 sensors, which usually require UV light or elevated temperature to improve the recovery 19. Analysis of the response curve of the S‐RGOH sensor divides it into two stages: rapid and slow response stages, respectively (Figure S1, Supporting Information) 14. The response in the rapid response stage produced the t 50 as short as 12 s. The fast response was attributed to molecular adsorption on low‐energy binding sites, such as sp 2 ‐bonded carbon.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…9Ϫ13 Recent work has also been published using chemically produced graphene as a chemical sensor. 14 Here we report the development of useful chemical sensors based on chemically converted graphene using spincoating of hydrazine dispersions on interdigitated planar electrode arrays, as shown in Figure 1. Preliminary results are presented on the detection of NO 2 and NH 3 using this simple and scalable fabrication method for practical devices.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Here the oxygen groups can act as adsorption sites, which would make the gas molecules easier to adsorb on the graphene. By forming GO continuous film on an insulating substrate from the aqueous dispersion, Sheehan et al fabricated GO‐based gas sensors 112. What's more, the active oxygen defects on the surface could selectively detect different molecules.…”
Section: The Human‐like Senses and Feedbacksmentioning
confidence: 99%