1999 IEEE 49th Vehicular Technology Conference (Cat. No.99CH36363)
DOI: 10.1109/vetec.1999.780557
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Reduced complexity detection of bandwidth efficient partial response CPM

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1

Citation Types

0
3
0

Publication Types

Select...
4
2
1

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 11 publications
(3 citation statements)
references
References 8 publications
0
3
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Thus, the L = 2 is also set for LPA-based synchronization. Table 1 shows that under the same 16-state trellis, the LPA-based estimator from Equation (32) requires no subtractor and only 1/3 MFs of the EL-based method due to the reduction in the derivative in Equation (15). Note that the LPA-based estimator of the timing error signal, with MN state = 64 branches of the trellis, has 64 multipliers more than the EL-based estimator.…”
Section: Comparison Between El-based and Lpa-based Synchronization Al...mentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Thus, the L = 2 is also set for LPA-based synchronization. Table 1 shows that under the same 16-state trellis, the LPA-based estimator from Equation (32) requires no subtractor and only 1/3 MFs of the EL-based method due to the reduction in the derivative in Equation (15). Note that the LPA-based estimator of the timing error signal, with MN state = 64 branches of the trellis, has 64 multipliers more than the EL-based estimator.…”
Section: Comparison Between El-based and Lpa-based Synchronization Al...mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…However, tremendous complexity is introduced by the trellis of a large number of phase states and branches. Due to its high complexity, some reducedcomplexity methods are proposed, such as tilted phase transformation (TPT) [10,11], frequency pulse truncation (FPT) [11,12], pulse amplitude modulation (PAM) [13,14], and state-space partitioning (SSP) [11,15]. All the above methods have been discussed in [16], and have been widely used in various CPM receivers [11,[17][18][19][20].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Due to its high complexity, some reduced-complexity methods are proposed to close to the optimal MLSD algorithm, such as tilde phase transformation (TPT) [8], frequency pulse truncation (FPT) [9], pulse amplitude modulation (PAM) [10], [11], and state-space partitioning (SSP) [12], [13]. All the above methods have been discussed in [14].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%