Globecom '00 - IEEE. Global Telecommunications Conference. Conference Record (Cat. No.00CH37137)
DOI: 10.1109/glocom.2000.891302
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Reduced-complexity detection algorithms for systems using multi-element arrays

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4

Citation Types

0
53
0
1

Publication Types

Select...
7
2

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 70 publications
(54 citation statements)
references
References 5 publications
0
53
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…Compared to the optimal solution, the GD achieves near-optimal performance at a significantly reduced complexity. The concept from [20] was extended in [21] to group antenna detection (GAD) using linear subspace processing for inter-group interference (IGI) suppression of spatially-multiplexed MIMO channels with frequency-flat fading. Also, the authors of [21] presented a channel correlation-based group selection (GS) scheme that optimizes the grouping for each individual antenna with respect to optimum system performance.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Compared to the optimal solution, the GD achieves near-optimal performance at a significantly reduced complexity. The concept from [20] was extended in [21] to group antenna detection (GAD) using linear subspace processing for inter-group interference (IGI) suppression of spatially-multiplexed MIMO channels with frequency-flat fading. Also, the authors of [21] presented a channel correlation-based group selection (GS) scheme that optimizes the grouping for each individual antenna with respect to optimum system performance.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…al. [22] has recently shown that the GAD scheme [21] can be further improved when taking into account the noise statistics at the receiver. Particularly, they proposed a group separation strategy based on groupwise linear filtering maximizing the signal-to-interference-plus-noise ratio (SINR) in each subgroup.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…์ด๋Ÿฌํ•œ ์š”๊ตฌ์‚ฌํ•ญ์„ ๋งŒ์กฑ์‹œํ‚ค๊ธฐ ์œ„ํ•ด ํ•œ์ •๋œ ์ฃผํŒŒ์ˆ˜ ๋Œ€์—ญ์„ ์‚ฌ์šฉํ•ด์„œ ๊ณ ์šฉ๋Ÿ‰์˜ ๋ฐ์ด ํ„ฐ๋ฅผ ์ „์†กํ•˜๋Š” MIMO ์‹œ์Šคํ…œ์˜ ๊ฐœ๋ฐœ์ด ์ง€์†์ ์œผ๋กœ ์ด๋ฃจ์–ด์ง€๊ณ  ์žˆ๋‹ค [1] . MIMO ์‹œ์Šคํ…œ์€ ์†ก์‹ ๊ธฐ์™€ ์ˆ˜์‹ ๊ธฐ์— ๋‹ค์ค‘์˜ ์•ˆํ…Œ ๋‚˜๋ฅผ ์ด์šฉํ•˜์—ฌ ์„œ๋กœ ๋‹ค๋ฅธ ๋ฐ์ดํ„ฐ ์ŠคํŠธ๋ฆผ์„ ๋™์‹œ์— ์ „์†กํ•จ์œผ๋กœ์จ ์‹œ์Šคํ…œ์˜ ์ฃผํŒŒ์ˆ˜ ๋Œ€์—ญํญ์„ ์ฆ๊ฐ€์‹œํ‚ค ์ง€ ์•Š๊ณ  ๊ณ ์†์˜ ๋ฐ์ดํ„ฐ๋ฅผ ์ „์†กํ•  ์ˆ˜ ์žˆ๋Š” ๊ณต๊ฐ„ ๋‹ค์ค‘ ํ™” ๊ธฐ๋ฒ•๊ณผ ๋‹ค์ค‘์˜ ์†ก์‹  ์•ˆํ…Œ๋‚˜์—์„œ ๊ฐ™๊ฑฐ๋‚˜ ๋ณ€ํ˜•๋œ ๋ฐ์ดํ„ฐ๋ฅผ ์ „์†กํ•˜์—ฌ ์„ฑ๋Šฅ์„ ํ–ฅ์ƒ์‹œํ‚ค๋Š” ๊ณต๊ฐ„ ๋‹ค์ด๋ฒ„ ์‹œํ‹ฐ ๊ธฐ์ˆ ๋กœ ๋‚˜๋ˆŒ ์ˆ˜ ์žˆ๋‹ค [2] . ์ด๋Ÿฌํ•œ MIMO [7] .…”
unclassified
“…Although linear detectors, such as the linear minimum-mean-squared-error (MMSE) detector, typically exhibit a low complexity, their performance is significantly worse than that of the ML detector. The non-linear successive interference cancellation (SIC) algorithm detects each symbol sequentially with the aid of classic remodulation and subtraction based cancelling operations, and exhibits an attractive performance versus complexity trade-off [2]- [4]. However, its performance is nonetheless inferior with respect to ML detection [4].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%