2020
DOI: 10.1002/lary.29283
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Reduced Asthma Medication Use after Treatment of Pediatric Paradoxical Vocal Fold Motion Disorder

Abstract: Objectives/Hypotheses: The primary objective of this study was to determine whether the diagnosis and treatment of pediatric Paradoxical Vocal Fold Motion Disorder (PVFMD) leads to decreased asthma medication use. Our secondary objective was to determine dyspnea outcomes following diagnosis and treatment for PVFMD.Study Design: Prospective observational study. Methods: Patients with newly diagnosed PVFMD between the ages of 11 and 17 were recruited at a single pediatric institution. A medication questionnaire … Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
10
0

Year Published

2022
2022
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
5

Relationship

0
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 10 publications
(13 citation statements)
references
References 16 publications
(27 reference statements)
0
10
0
Order By: Relevance
“…A total of 1559 references were identified through database searching and 11 additional through reference reviews. After removing duplicates and identifying records from other sources (reference lists of reviews), the titles and abstracts of 1076 studies were screened for relevance, and 31 studies were selected for full‐text review for eligibility, resulting in the inclusion of eight cohort studies: one retrospective chart review, one prospective, and six observational cohort studies 22–29 . No randomized controlled trials (RCTs) were identified.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 4 more Smart Citations
“…A total of 1559 references were identified through database searching and 11 additional through reference reviews. After removing duplicates and identifying records from other sources (reference lists of reviews), the titles and abstracts of 1076 studies were screened for relevance, and 31 studies were selected for full‐text review for eligibility, resulting in the inclusion of eight cohort studies: one retrospective chart review, one prospective, and six observational cohort studies 22–29 . No randomized controlled trials (RCTs) were identified.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…After removing duplicates and identifying records from other sources (reference lists of reviews), the titles and abstracts of 1076 studies were screened for relevance, and 31 studies were selected for fulltext review for eligibility, resulting in the inclusion of eight cohort studies: one retrospective chart review, one prospective, and six observational cohort studies. [22][23][24][25][26][27][28][29] No randomized controlled trials (RCTs) were identified. Eight case studies were identified but excluded from the analysis.…”
Section: Study Selection and Characteristics Of Included Studiesmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 3 more Smart Citations