2017
DOI: 10.1016/j.epsl.2017.09.011
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Redox-controlled carbon and phosphorus burial: A mechanism for enhanced organic carbon sequestration during the PETM

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

3
41
2

Year Published

2018
2018
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
6
2

Relationship

2
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 28 publications
(55 citation statements)
references
References 73 publications
3
41
2
Order By: Relevance
“…Various other forms of organic carbon sequestration may be the cause of the recorded phasing. For example, increased burial of C org may occur on land during eccentricity minima because constant precipitation above peatlands provides conditions for the development of year-round soil anoxia (Kurtz et al, 2003;Zachos et al, 2010). The resulting 13 C-enriched global exogenic carbon pool would be consistent with the phase relation we see in sediment records.…”
Section: Introductionsupporting
confidence: 71%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…Various other forms of organic carbon sequestration may be the cause of the recorded phasing. For example, increased burial of C org may occur on land during eccentricity minima because constant precipitation above peatlands provides conditions for the development of year-round soil anoxia (Kurtz et al, 2003;Zachos et al, 2010). The resulting 13 C-enriched global exogenic carbon pool would be consistent with the phase relation we see in sediment records.…”
Section: Introductionsupporting
confidence: 71%
“…As C org burial is primarily controlled by sediment accumulation (Berner, 1982;Hedges and Keil, 1995;Berner, 2006), the direct topdown control for C org burial would be river runoff, which corresponds to seasonal precipitation patterns (see also Paillard, 2017;Zeebe et al, 2017). Although the exact mechanistic link between eccentricity forcing and sediment deposition remains elusive, we demonstrate that marine C org burial provides an alternative to other proposed mechanisms that link the carbon cycle to astronomical forcing, such as carbon storage in peatland soils (Kurtz et al, 2003), methane hydrate reservoirs, or ice-sheet dynamics (de Boer et al, 2014).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 78%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…The PETM carbon cycle perturbations are unusual both in magnitude and duration, and likely a result of a combination of triggers and feedback mechanisms that are not yet fully understood (McInerney and Wing, 2011; 635 Komar and Zeebe, 2017). Continuous emissions from a light carbon source such as thermogenic degassing around the NAIP could have contributed to the long duration (Svensen et al, 2004;Frieling et al 2016).…”
Section: The Petm Recoverymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In the original LOSCAR model (version 2.0.4), the biological pump is decoupled from the long carbon cycle described above, meaning that C org that is produced in surface oceans is fully remineralised in the intermediate and deep ocean boxes (see Zeebe, 2012, for a full description). We note that Komar and Zeebe (2017) included a long-term, coupled C org -O 2 -PO 4 feedback in LOSCAR. However, a simplified approach is used here (see below), since our simple forcing does not invoke additional controls on C org burial, such as productivity.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%