2011
DOI: 10.1016/j.surg.2010.03.017
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Redo surgery for failed colorectal or coloanal anastomosis: A valuable surgical challenge

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1

Citation Types

2
53
2
2

Year Published

2012
2012
2020
2020

Publication Types

Select...
5
4

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 69 publications
(59 citation statements)
references
References 26 publications
2
53
2
2
Order By: Relevance
“…Their 33 % failure rate in new handsewn coloanal anastomosis was markedly higher than the 5 % rate in new stapled colorectal anastomosis, as well. The even better results of another study on redo surgery after failed colorectal or coloanal anastomosis are not comparable with our or Levefre's results [28], because 42 % of the primary operations were performed for an indication other than rectal cancer, and the median height of the primary anastomosis was 9 cm from the anal verge [29]. Thus, since the results of redo surgery after low colorectal or coloanal anastomoses are far from encouraging, redo anastomosis should be attempted only in selected cases.…”
Section: Discussioncontrasting
confidence: 96%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Their 33 % failure rate in new handsewn coloanal anastomosis was markedly higher than the 5 % rate in new stapled colorectal anastomosis, as well. The even better results of another study on redo surgery after failed colorectal or coloanal anastomosis are not comparable with our or Levefre's results [28], because 42 % of the primary operations were performed for an indication other than rectal cancer, and the median height of the primary anastomosis was 9 cm from the anal verge [29]. Thus, since the results of redo surgery after low colorectal or coloanal anastomoses are far from encouraging, redo anastomosis should be attempted only in selected cases.…”
Section: Discussioncontrasting
confidence: 96%
“…Somewhat more promising results have been published by Lefevre and his coworkers [28]. They reported a 56 % failure rate in redo coloanal anastomosis surgery.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 83%
“…A transanal pelvic drainage can be placed via the rectal stump that is left open with the advantage of radical treatment of pelvic sepsis and the AL with low operative mortality. The disadvantage is creating a difficult, more complex reconstruction procedure in a ''frozen pelvis'' with a high-risk of definitive stoma [49,50,54,55].…”
Section: Surgical Treatment Via Laparotomymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…But those operations are associated with a considerable morbidity and mortality. Hence, major complications were reported in up to 18 % of surgical procedures performed for anastomotic strictures [11][12][13].…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%