1978
DOI: 10.1016/0032-3861(78)90112-x
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Redistribution of impurities in crystallizing polymers

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
24
0

Year Published

1981
1981
2004
2004

Publication Types

Select...
7
1

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 65 publications
(24 citation statements)
references
References 8 publications
0
24
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Crystalline contents, which are values corrected by the real amount of organic polymer in each composite (70% as average), were calculated by using 209 J/g for a 100% crystalline polypropylene. 24 In all cases three pots containing about 10 mg of each sample were tested, thus confirming reproducibility of results.…”
Section: Characterization Proceduresmentioning
confidence: 87%
“…Crystalline contents, which are values corrected by the real amount of organic polymer in each composite (70% as average), were calculated by using 209 J/g for a 100% crystalline polypropylene. 24 In all cases three pots containing about 10 mg of each sample were tested, thus confirming reproducibility of results.…”
Section: Characterization Proceduresmentioning
confidence: 87%
“…Chain ends, low molecular weight oligomers, branches, additives, catalyst residue, and any other molecules that do not possess the symmetry needed to form crystals make up such “impurities”. These impurities are concentrated outside the lamellar structures of the polymeric crystals present in the solid state 48–55,94. The fact that these species, and in particular chain ends and catalyst residue, are concentrated in the amorphous regions around the growing crystallites where molecular mobility is favoured means that we can maintain sufficiently high rates of reaction even in the solid state 47,84.…”
Section: The Production Of Pet In the Solid Phase A Look At The Currmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Inter-spherulitic fractures similar to those in Fig. 9 are reported in filled and unfilled highly crystalline polymers [25][26][27] and are attributed to a weak interspherulitic boundary caused by syneresis of impurities, low molecular weight additives, or an enrichment of a particular filler in the interspherulitic region. 28 Figure 9 discloses part of a broader systematic relationship between the applied hold pressure, the mold temperature, and the crystalline structure of polymers in ceramic moldings.…”
Section: (2) Solidification Of Moldingsmentioning
confidence: 84%
“…10 and 13 arises from an enrichment of low molecular weight additive. The segregation of low molecular weight additives or impurities from growing spherulites in POM 11,24 and other semicrystalline polymers 25,28 is widely discussed and is reported to enhance interspherulitic fracture 25,28 displayed here in Figs. 9 and 12.…”
Section: (4) Molding Defectsmentioning
confidence: 95%