2021
DOI: 10.1111/gcbb.12877
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Redefining marginal land for bioenergy crop production

Abstract: This is an open access article under the terms of the Creat ive Commo ns Attri bution License, which permits use, distribution and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
36
0
1

Year Published

2022
2022
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
8
1
1

Relationship

2
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 72 publications
(49 citation statements)
references
References 155 publications
0
36
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…Because of the high transportation cost, the feedstock market (especially the cellulosic feedstock market) is expected to be regional rather than national. In addition, given the impact of various bioenergy policies (e.g., the Biomass Crop Assistance Program) and land availabilities for cellulosic energy crops, ,, a nationwide consistent cellulosic biomass price is unlikely. To investigate the impact of feedstock price on refinery water use impact, the incorporation of an economic model such as the Biofuel and Environmental Policy Analysis Model (BEPAM) is suggested.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Because of the high transportation cost, the feedstock market (especially the cellulosic feedstock market) is expected to be regional rather than national. In addition, given the impact of various bioenergy policies (e.g., the Biomass Crop Assistance Program) and land availabilities for cellulosic energy crops, ,, a nationwide consistent cellulosic biomass price is unlikely. To investigate the impact of feedstock price on refinery water use impact, the incorporation of an economic model such as the Biofuel and Environmental Policy Analysis Model (BEPAM) is suggested.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Data on land cover have been used to identify abandoned agricultural lands with potential to support bioenergy feedstock production (Zumkehr and Campbell, 2013;Baxter and Calvert, 2017;Goga et al, 2019;Naess et al, 2021) and to screen for land that may be deemed as marginal for food production (Nalepa and Bauer, 2012;Kang et al, 2013;Khanna et al, 2021) due to economic instability (Jiang et al, 2021), environmental sensitivity (Wang et al, 2020), and biophysical limitations in climate, soils, or topography (Gelfand et al, 2013;Gu and Wylie, 2016). For example, satellite-based productivity thresholds on low-yielding lands have been used to identify marginal areas for second generation bioenergy production (Longato et al, 2019).…”
Section: Bioenergy Resources and Productionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The above results show that the scale of land management has a significantly negative impact on the CPC. Furthermore, related research suggests [36][37][38][39][40][41] that there is a "U-shaped" relationship between the unit cost of crops and the scale of land. In other words, the expansion of the scale of land management's effect of reducing crop production costs gradually weakens.…”
Section: Empirical Analysis Of Factors Affecting Corn Production Costmentioning
confidence: 99%