2020 International Conference on Computer Communication and Informatics (ICCCI) 2020
DOI: 10.1109/iccci48352.2020.9104095
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Red Wine Quality Prediction Using Machine Learning Techniques

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

0
13
0

Year Published

2021
2021
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
4
4

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 39 publications
(19 citation statements)
references
References 8 publications
0
13
0
Order By: Relevance
“…where 𝑓 𝑖 𝑖 , 𝑛 𝑖 𝑗 are the importance of feature 𝑖, the importance of node 𝑗 respectively. Then with dividing by the sum of all feature importance values, they can be normalized to a value given in (11) between 0 and 1…”
Section: Random Forestmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…where 𝑓 𝑖 𝑖 , 𝑛 𝑖 𝑗 are the importance of feature 𝑖, the importance of node 𝑗 respectively. Then with dividing by the sum of all feature importance values, they can be normalized to a value given in (11) between 0 and 1…”
Section: Random Forestmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…To verify the accuracy of our chosen model Random Forest, we need to compare the obtained accuracy, precision, F1 score, confusion matrix, and AUC with other models. Here we apply Logistic regression [9], SVM [10], and NaiveBayes [11] as the baselines.…”
Section: Baselinesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In recent years there is an increase in wine consumption, and wine industries strive to produce good quality wine at less cost (Kumar, 2020). Most of the chemicals are almost the same for different types of wine.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Most of the chemicals are almost the same for different types of wine. However, the exact fine concentration of each chemical is different in different types of wines (Kumar, 2020).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…When utilizing RStudio software to estimate white wine quality, the Support Vector Machine performed best, with an accuracy of 67.25 percent, followed by the Random Forest, which had a 65.83 percent accuracy, and the Nave Bayes technique, which had a 55.91 percent accuracy. [6] Based on neural networks supplied with 15 input parameters, [7] identified six geographic wine origins. For their investigations in Germany, they employed 170 data samples.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%