2015
DOI: 10.1177/0002716214555693
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Red States, Blue States, and Brain States

Abstract: Advances in neuroscience are beginning to shape law and public policy, giving rise to the field of “neurolaw.” The impact of neuroscientific evidence on how laws are written and interpreted in practice will depend in part on how neurolaw is understood by the public. Drawing on a nationally representative telephone survey experiment, this article presents the first evidence on public approval of neurolaw. We find that the public is generally neutral in its support for neuroscience-based legal reforms. However, … Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1

Citation Types

0
2
0

Year Published

2016
2016
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
4
2

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 11 publications
(2 citation statements)
references
References 37 publications
0
2
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The reasons for irrational beliefs have been the subject of extensive scientific literature. People's critical thinking abilities, political, and religious ideologies, as well as cognitive skills and scientific knowledge are some of those reasons (Bensley & Lilienfeld, 2017;Bensley, Lilienfeld, & Powell, 2014;Boudry, Blancke, & Pigliucci, 2015;Bronstein, Pennycook, Bear, Rand, & Cannon, 2018;Gauchat, 2012;Majima, 2015;Nisbet, Cooper, & Garrett, 2015;Pennycook, Cheyne, Barr, Koehler, & Fugelsang, 2015;Shen & Gromet, 2015). But why do some organizations in the fields of security and justice turn to pseudoscience and pseudoscientific techniques?…”
Section: Why Do Some Organizations Turn To Pseudoscience?mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The reasons for irrational beliefs have been the subject of extensive scientific literature. People's critical thinking abilities, political, and religious ideologies, as well as cognitive skills and scientific knowledge are some of those reasons (Bensley & Lilienfeld, 2017;Bensley, Lilienfeld, & Powell, 2014;Boudry, Blancke, & Pigliucci, 2015;Bronstein, Pennycook, Bear, Rand, & Cannon, 2018;Gauchat, 2012;Majima, 2015;Nisbet, Cooper, & Garrett, 2015;Pennycook, Cheyne, Barr, Koehler, & Fugelsang, 2015;Shen & Gromet, 2015). But why do some organizations in the fields of security and justice turn to pseudoscience and pseudoscientific techniques?…”
Section: Why Do Some Organizations Turn To Pseudoscience?mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Looking specifically at national brain projects, we can see numerous attempts by stakeholders to systematically integrate brain science and society (Shen and Gromet, 2015). For example, the Work Programme 2016 of the French National Research Agency (ANR) promotes collaborative research in humanities and neurosciences to better understand the social dimension of human brains, e.g., memory, behaviors, conscience, thought, language, and relationships with others (http://www.agence-nationalerecherche.fr/en/funding-opportunities/ work-programme-2016/).…”
Section: Framework For Integrating Brain Science and Societymentioning
confidence: 99%