2015
DOI: 10.1016/j.meatsci.2015.05.019
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Red meat consumption and ischemic heart disease. A systematic literature review

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

0
14
0
1

Year Published

2016
2016
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
5
3

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 31 publications
(15 citation statements)
references
References 22 publications
(36 reference statements)
0
14
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…Although the 2015-2020 Dietary Guidelines for Americans removed the recommendations of setting a limit to the maximum intake of 300 mg/day cholesterol, the Guidelines still advised eating as little as possible of dietary cholesterol. The emphasis is shifted away from fat quantity to fat quality and to lower dietary intake of saturated fatty acids and total cholesterol [2,4,16].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…Although the 2015-2020 Dietary Guidelines for Americans removed the recommendations of setting a limit to the maximum intake of 300 mg/day cholesterol, the Guidelines still advised eating as little as possible of dietary cholesterol. The emphasis is shifted away from fat quantity to fat quality and to lower dietary intake of saturated fatty acids and total cholesterol [2,4,16].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Several studies reported that consumption of red meat may increase the risk of cardiovascular disease (CVD) and colon cancer thus leading to a negative perception of the role of meat in health. However, current literature data does not support the existence of an unquestionable relationship between a large intake of red meat and the risk of myocardial ischemia [2,[4][5][6]. Accepting all the reported data, moderate intake of a variety of foods, including meats that are enjoyed by people, remains the best dietary advice [7].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 97%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…The interactive links between diet and the risk of chronic diseases have been the focus of international research efforts over the last few decades. For example, the intake of meat, particularly red meat, has been associated with an increased risk of type 2 diabetes [ 6 ], coronary heart disease [ 7 ], and certain forms of cancer [ 8 ] in epidemiologic studies. In contrast, the intake of fish appears to be protective against these diseases, especially on cardiovascular disease [ 9 , 10 ], whereas it shows both inverse [ 11 , 12 ] and direct [ 13 , 14 ] associations with the risk of type 2 diabetes.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Although this observation does not resolve the question of causality one way or the other, it should generate some skepticism that meat is the culprit (Feinman, 2018). Moreover, several studies have found either that meat intake has no association with mortality/morbidity, or that meat restriction is association with various negative health outcomes (e.g., Key et al, 2009;Burkert et al, 2014;Kwok et al, 2014;Lippi et al, 2015;Hur et al, 2018;Iguacel et al, 2018;Yen et al, 2018). As another example of conflicting information, the epidemiological association pointing to a potential role of the meat nutrient L-carnitine in atherosclerosis via trimethylamine N-oxide (TMAO) formation (Koeth et al, 2013), is contradicted by intervention studies (Samulak et al, 2019) and epidemiological data showing that fish intake, being by orders of magnitude the largest supplier of TMAO (Zhang et al, 1999), improves triglycerides and HDL levels (Alhassan et al, 2017).…”
Section: A Scientific Assessment Should Not Overlook Conflicting Datamentioning
confidence: 99%