1991
DOI: 10.1177/0013916591232004
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Recycling as Altruistic Behavior

Abstract: Experimental and survey data were gathered from residents of a large urban neighborhood with a community wide curbside recycling program in order to determine the extent to which recycling could be conceptualized as altruistic behavior. Results confirmed that recycling behavior is consistent with Schwartz's altruism model, according to which behavior is influenced by social norms, personal norms, and awareness of consequences. Data further showed that a block-leader program, in which residents encouraged their… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

9
102
0
4

Year Published

1999
1999
2017
2017

Publication Types

Select...
5
4

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 739 publications
(115 citation statements)
references
References 36 publications
9
102
0
4
Order By: Relevance
“…Previous literature uses values as factors determining environmentally friendly behavior (EFB) on the application of the altruistic behavior concept [15]. Many prior studies apply personal norms, feelings of moral obligation, and altruism to explore behaviors related to energy saving [16], recycling [17], and taking action in environment protection [18].…”
Section: Environmentally Friendly Behavior (Efb)mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Previous literature uses values as factors determining environmentally friendly behavior (EFB) on the application of the altruistic behavior concept [15]. Many prior studies apply personal norms, feelings of moral obligation, and altruism to explore behaviors related to energy saving [16], recycling [17], and taking action in environment protection [18].…”
Section: Environmentally Friendly Behavior (Efb)mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Habits pertaining to other travel modes are also hard to change (Nilsson & Küller, 2000;Tait, Laing, & Gray, 2014) raising questions about the habitual nature of travel decisions and the social identity associated with specific modes of transport. However, ideas around raising hypocrisy are worth pursuing because they may provide the key to lasting and meaningful change (Aronson, 1992;Dickerson et al, 1992;Fointiat, 2004;Hing et al, 2002) in a way that information providing alone has not done (Hopper & Nielsen, 1991). Nevertheless, education and information campaigns have a role to play in raising awareness and therefore can affect attitude formation.…”
Section: Implications For Changing Consumption Practicesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This behaviour is thus driven by a personal norm, such as altruism, and this in turn has effect on both environmental attitudes and actions such as recycling (Stern et al, 2005;Vining & Ebreo, 1990). Hopper and Nielsen (1991) suggest that recycling reflects altruism, and that the altruism model is appropriate when examining recycling behaviour. In the case of recycling, behaviour can be regarded as altruistic, as the customer invests time and effort to advantage someone else (either the recycler or the organisation itself) without receiving any kind of compensation.…”
Section: Theories Of Environmental Behaviourmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…For engaging in this behaviour, the consumer experiences a number of intrinsic benefits. These include a feeling of impacting on the environment for the 'common good' of society (Hopper & Nielsen, 1991;Huge Brodin & Anderson, 2008), as well as the ability of future generations to enjoy the environment. From the theories mentioned above, the role of attitudes, knowledge and contextual factors in environmental behaviour can be identified as some of the key drivers of behaviour.…”
Section: Theories Of Environmental Behaviourmentioning
confidence: 99%